To be honest the issue is more about the power tripping than politics. Banning someone from the Arch Linux community because they disagree with you seems strange
Lemmy.ml and Lemmy.cafe are like Gmail and Outlook, different services that can still send email to each other in a normal configuration.
Except here Lemmy.cafe decided to block Lemmy.ml. Using Lemmy.cafe you can still interact with for instance lemmy.world communities and users for instance
I’m just uncomfortable with the way that people are so eager to foster that in world. We shouldn’t have to see them misbehave before we apply what we learned from previous mistakes.
You're preaching to the choir, but "for now" it's acceptable to me.
We are always able to move communities to other instances should they misbehave, and that's good enough to me.
The admin of the server becomes a “mere” service provider, and those that create communities are then responsible for moderation and that content being hosted there.
Would you be able to prevent admins to interfere with moderation of the communities? Seems to be the biggest issue here
Or maybe it was the most popular server when the Librewolf devs decided on an instance for their community.