Skip Navigation

Posts
32
Comments
619
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Oof

    Jump
  • You know, there's a story from one of Rousseau's that I've read before that goes a little like this:

    After hoarding a bunch of ressources from the people, the rich started to get resistance from the peasants, and their property was in jeopardy. So they just said something along the lines of: "Isn't it awful that we are fighting each other? Let's make sure that we make laws so that everyone's property is protected, and a power to enforce these law ". The peasants then started to cling to what little property they had, and justified the rich's property. Never mind the torturous work they went through, the starvation, the poverty, it would be wrong to steal from someone. How would you feel if somebody stole from you. This is easy to think when you just "move on from the past".

    Black people still didn't get compensation for slavery. Indigenous people got everything stolen from them, and didn't receive any form of compensation. Marginalized people are still affected by stuff like systematic racism and capitalism. America benefits from its past imperialism, and present one (Israel)

  • I'm kinda new what's wrong with Trotskyists?

  • Quebec W

  • Very underated imo

  • Huh? Why can I still see your comment?

  • They want us to be as angry as they are lmao

  • OK i might get a loops account this was funny

  • It's giving not wanting to deal with the consequences of your actions

  • I'll gladly download the app!

    ... To help, of course!

  • A bunch of abreviations, like etc., eg., and some others like quid pro quo

  • Je lisait toujours Tom-Tom et Nana quand j'étais jeune. C'est triste a savoir qu'elle est partie :(

  • I usually use the scaled sort in order to find niche communities

  • So uhhh, I went to check their accound, and they're still posting? Not only that, they were banned from this community a while ago.

    Like can you guys look up stuff before claiming anything?

  • I understand. Thank you!

  • Thanks for answering! I was more wondering what kind of issue DNS solved and why it was solved that way. Also if anyone thought of another solution.

    I also read the history here (https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/pressingissues2000/briefingbook/dnshistory.html), and it still seems pretty sketchy to me that the concern of website names being inaccessible to small businesses and such was solved with the ICANN. Didn't this just make domain names into stuff you could speculate with? I may be tweaking rn, but I don't think it's necessarily right.

  • I've seen the crypto scams, unfortunately, which is basically what brought me to ask this question.

    Is there a reason why they decided that domain names should be owned? Cause it kinda sounds like the metaverse, but older (like buying digital land and stuff). And idk, it just leaves a bad taste for me at least.

  • I meant more like did it have to be a central agreement for it to scale up to what it is now?

  • But why did everyone agree to that? Couldn't domains be determined by user, or at least a bit more decentralized? (ex: google.com leads to IP address 1.1.1.1)

  • Yay, racism ;-;