You used this phrase "israeli civilians", a term that is contradictory. Settlers cannot be civillians, and all israelis are reservists and must serve a term in the Army.
I think its more that she just hit all of her success and basically has a bootstraps mentality at this point. Incidentally, her content transitioned from good, derailing right wing talking to points to navel gazing liberal superiority with her own transition and success. I think the financial security made her confident in her personal security and liberal tendencies and it bled into everything.
I get it, in fact, I think theyre putting a band-aid over their own problems when they create so much DLC with such narrow focuses and refuse to have it be just a free update, or to just release a "new" game instead. Like EU4 has been at least 4 different games at this point, looking up gameplay from release to today is insane and its also disgusting that you cant really even play the game as it was unless you just find a cracked version of the game still uploaded somewhere.
I actually really like their expansion pass system but goddamn, V3 already has like 4 expansions, really making me like No Man's Sky for keeping their shit simple.
Victoria 3 is on sale and I was debating buying it but it already seems to have a lot of expansion content that would improve the gameplay and that is once again giving me paralysis towards buying it.
Do I buy it, do I buy some of the expansions that are worth it?
I read it in highschool for that reason, I think it was really the first and maybe last horror book I ever read, shit was real dark and depressing and i dont even really remember much of it because of that.
I feel like this is where I diverge, I dont feel like any prison solution is permanent or without flaw, I can very easily imagine scenarios where a permanently incarcerated person could not be that anymore, and continue or be emboldened by their release. I do agree that a government free of class conceptions and the trappings of a State wouldnt need to or would have very little reason for a death penalty. We are very far from those times.
Also quick edit, while I think there is utility in the death penalty, I do also think theres not a lot of good solutions for carrying it out in a humane way that shows care rather than the barbarity of it. And also whether or not the barbarity of taking someones life should be exposed for how brutal it is or should be softened to reflect a better nature of carrying it out.
What are good reasons for killing anyone? There are lots, and thats the problem with being anti death penalty. Personally I dont find the death penalty suitable for low quantity crimes of murder, but should someone who has killed, 80 people, children even, like Anders Breivik be allowed to survive and even engage with the society he committed the crime in? I dont think so, nor should a person who knowingly condemned 500 people to an early grave through cancer and the like for thousands of dollars. I think these people have fundamentally forgotten and thrown away their humanity for their own sake, and you cant have a society where that is acceptable.
Its going to be very hard to declare what 6th gen is without thorough battleground testing, as even the war in Ukraine has upended what a full scale conflict will look like and what role for an airforce the modern battlefield has at all.
I'm gonna cum