An LLM could be useful for explaining people how they failed to follow simple guidelines, like including the software version or not filing multiple issues in one. However, issues written by AI can fuck the right off.
I just want "real" posts with human thought and intent behind them. Because what's even the point of a social media of machine-generated content? The more you outsource to the machine, the less real it becomes. AI images look like shit as well, but that may eventually pass.
In this case, the captions are written too well to be designed by the statistics machine. So maybe it deserves less flak than for example that one slop comic a bit ago where the AI gave a glass of water a speech bubble. The hierarchy lines are still clearly hallucinated by the AI and not designed by a human.
can't use them
Flipping this around so that it's the AI bros who are doing something novel that others can't is some galaxy-brained mental gymnastics gaslight move. Fucking anyone can ask the image generator to generate an image.
Microsoft ate my homework