Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
1
Comments
149
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This is an article about another article, some top tier journalism. They're right about the external display though. I've yet to see a positive comment about it, seems like just a weird gimmick that drains the already short battery life.

  • There is no such thing as "green" energy, all energy has an environmental extraction/capture cost. Crypto has insane per user power usage, AI isn't quite as bad but it's still much higher than normal websearch. Both should be used sparingly in cases where they actually make sense.

  • Just a few more parameters, then the text prediction model will become sentient.

  • The fact that you can't buy the cable needed to unbrick a Chromebook, and have to solder it together yourself from Google's schematics is ridiculous.

  • QKSMS has less active development but I don't think that's an issue as it works well as is. I haven't dug too deeply into the more advanced stuff but I've yet to have any issues with it.

  • Seems kind of like phi but for writing, the smaller ones are trained with 50B tokens and the largest is only trained with 18B.

  • It's not private data if you publish it online.

    They already had this data, I'm not sure why anyone cares about what they're doing with it now. It's not any worse than selling it outright.

  • The drive is visible to the OS so if they have any kind of management software in place which looks for hardware changes it will be noticed.

  • Anywhere speculative investment is involved there are cult like patterns. If your investors don't believe that your product is going to revolutionize its field you're not going to get the kind of funding these startups want.

  • So the solution is to just not do that.

  • A language model can't determine good from bad because it's only trained to predict the next token based on what it has seen.

  • The definition of understanding they use is very shallow compared to how most would define it. Failure to complete a task consistently when numbers are changed, even when they don't effect the answer shows a lack of real understanding to most. Asking a model the sheet drying question for example will give different results depending on what numbers you use. Better models are better at generalizing but are still far from demonstrating what most consider to be real understanding.

  • The article says "already" like this is the result of something new and not the machine translation we've had for well over a decade.

  • Tech companies say they are putting in place systems to prevent AI being used for criminal or other malign purposes, and insist the new technology will create more jobs than it destroys

    Automation doesn't create more jobs than it replaces, if it did there would be no point. In some cases it removes bottlenecks which allows for greater scale which in turn creates jobs, but these new jobs often require different skillsets from the ones displaced.

    You're not really allowed to criticize them for this when your economic system encourages this exact behavior.

  • This isn't shocking at all. The markets for obscure language content are incredibly small so there's no incentive for most to spend resources on it. I'd argue mediocre machine translation is better than nothing at all in many cases, but for unsupervised training it does pose a challenge.

  • 600 also scales to PAL standards

  • It won't matter until we hit 600. 600 integer scales to every common media framerate so frametimings are always perfect. Really they should be focusing on better and cheaper variable refresh rate but that's harder to market.

  • Very strange article. It lists several front ends, some of which are not open source, as well as some raw models without clearly distinguishing between them. RWKV was mentioned which is cool I guess.

    The first option listed should have been huggingchat, followed by the various local UIs, with a separate section discussing the models themselves.

  • Fragmenration is not preferred by most users and many of the services and systems these two run require large international teams. That's not to say that they don't need to be checked by antitrust.