Naja, nicht viel anders als seine sonstigen Reden. Viele Abschweifungen, Wiederholungen, immer wieder die gleichen Superlative, und herbeiphantasierte „Fakten“.
Ich glaube eher das ist der Versuch psychischer Manipulation. Wenn du deiner Bevölkerung ständig einredest, dass jeder sagt er verdiene den Friedensnobelpreis, glauben ihn das viele.
Bei der Tylenol Ankündigung hat er ja auch mindestens 20 mal wiederholt, dass man kein Tylenol mehr nehmen soll.
Die ganze Ansprache war so schrecklich, dass mir tatsächlich psychosomatisch übel wurde. Mir tun die Politiker leid die da sitzen und zuhören mussten, und ihn nicht ausbuhen durften. Wenn man da widerspricht hat das ja potentiell gleich Konsequenzen für die eigene Bevölkerung.
I've also been working relentlessly stopping the killing in Ukraine. I thought that would be, of the seven wars that I stopped, I thought that would be the easiest because of my relationship with President Putin, which had always been a good one. I thought that was going to be the easiest one. But in war, you never know what's going to happen. There are always lots of surprises, both good and bad. Everyone thought Russia would win this war in three days, but it didn't work out that way. It was supposed to be just a quick little skirmish. It's not making Russia look good, it's making them look bad.
No matter what happens from here on out, this was something that should have taken a matter of days, certainly less than a week, and they've been fighting for three and a half years and killing anywhere from 5 to 7,000, young soldiers, mostly, mostly soldiers on both sides, every single week from 5 to 7,000 dead young people. And some in cities, much smaller numbers where rockets are shot, where drones are dropped. This war would never have started if I were president.
This part of his speech sounded like „yeah, Russia should just have done this more efficiently“, or is it just me?
I've also been working relentlessly stopping the killing in Ukraine. I thought that would be, of the seven wars that I stopped, I thought that would be the easiest because of my relationship with President Putin, which had always been a good one. I thought that was going to be the easiest one. But in war, you never know what's going to happen. There are always lots of surprises, both good and bad. Everyone thought Russia would win this war in three days, but it didn't work out that way. It was supposed to be just a quick little skirmish. It's not making Russia look good, it's making them look bad.
No matter what happens from here on out, this was something that should have taken a matter of days, certainly less than a week, and they've been fighting for three and a half years and killing anywhere from 5 to 7,000, young soldiers, mostly, mostly soldiers on both sides, every single week from 5 to 7,000 dead young people. And some in cities, much smaller numbers where rockets are shot, where drones are dropped. This war would never have started if I were president.
(Hervorhebungen von mir)
Irgendwie klingt mir das nach „hätte Russland sich mal lieber besser angestellt“.
Hintergrund ist die Forderung von US-Präsident Donald Trump nach Preissenkungen. Anfang August hatte er unter anderem Schweizer Konzernen wie Pfizer, Roche und Novartis eine 60-Tage-Frist zur Preissenkung gesetzt. Für die Unternehmen stellt dies eine milliardenschwere Herausforderung dar. Novartis arbeite mit der Regierung zusammen und versuche, «konstruktive Lösungen zu finden, damit die Amerikaner weniger für ihre Medikamente bezahlen müssen», sagte der Konzernchef.
Ich würde diagnostizieren: die Lackpreise sind zu niedrig.
If the removal of the crucifix had interrupted his plans, and he thinks she will definitely turn vampire now, wouldn’t this even increase the urgency of doing something, like, I don’t know, removing her head and/or heart?
Even if he doesn’t know whether this would still help somehow, it’d surely be better than doing nothing?
I have always thought that a wild animal never looks so well as when some obstacle of pronounced durability is between us; a personal experience has intensified rather than diminished that idea.
Love this poetic paragraph. Makes me curious about the „personal experience“ our reporter might have had…
Depends. This would be one of those weird automations taking forever to debug, because they only work once or twice, and then fail the rest of the time.
You also lose some energy to heat while charging and discharging.
And depending on load profiles, you might not be able to load all of your excess solar power at once (depends on how many Watts the battery can be charged at) or fulfill your power requirement with battery alone (depends on how many Watts your battery can deliver).
Even better: generate a key pair to use for HA, and give the public part to Caddy to use for authenticating the HA server. If HA supports it, you could even generate a client certificate Caddy could use to authenticate against HA.
An overworked assistant to the store manager.