Which is fine. Potentially part of the huge known issue with the last couple of generations of Intel chips which affected a huge swath of CPUs, fixes have been released, but damage has been done - that alone would make me dubious about them going forward.
The more immediate issue though is, my CPU failed, I need to find some time to take the PC apart, safely box up the the CPU, figure out the intel rma procedure, ship it off, wait for intel to assess the cpu, hope they accept responsibility, ship me a new CPU and then find the time, once again, to take the PC apart to put the CPU back in. Twice. And I've been without PC for the entire time. And they most likely knew about the issues before the second gen of defective chips they launched. And it's not even the better chip as you mention. I'd be sufficiently pissed off to stay away.
OMG thank you for that knowledge! I've been putting off building a podcast server for years because I couldn't be arsed learning some front end framework.
My first thought on hearing frame is server. I'm likely way off the mark (to the point I don't actually think it's what they're doing) but it could be the basis for a cloud gaming setup for steam. Would extend the deck life and allow them to optimise settings for proton locally.
I think plenty of their supporters knew what they did and frankly they absolutely deserve to be punished for criminal damage. Proscribing them as a terror organisation, however, is waaaay disproportionate and in my personal opinion an abuse of the law. I think their supporters feel the same and are making a stand against this.
I totally understand the desire to cut someone down who's doing something destructive or counter to the norm in an extreme way but equally I don't think it's necessarily constructive. I can disagree with someone and express that without necessarily making them feel dumb.
Which is fine. Potentially part of the huge known issue with the last couple of generations of Intel chips which affected a huge swath of CPUs, fixes have been released, but damage has been done - that alone would make me dubious about them going forward.
The more immediate issue though is, my CPU failed, I need to find some time to take the PC apart, safely box up the the CPU, figure out the intel rma procedure, ship it off, wait for intel to assess the cpu, hope they accept responsibility, ship me a new CPU and then find the time, once again, to take the PC apart to put the CPU back in. Twice. And I've been without PC for the entire time. And they most likely knew about the issues before the second gen of defective chips they launched. And it's not even the better chip as you mention. I'd be sufficiently pissed off to stay away.