Sprinkle some finely shredded cheese on the pan slightly smaller than the piece of bread (the cheese expands as it melts) no need for extra oil or anything since the cheese is fatty enough. Toss the bread on top and let the magic happen. You'll know it's good and crispy when you can get your spatula/flipping utensil under the cheese without it squishing up or sticking to the pan. If either of those things happen, just give it a little more time
I may only be in a respiratory therapy program, but I've been an EMT for 10 years prior to that. If that experience is worth anything, I'd say verifying information before making a clinical decision is a far more important habit to build than memorizing two obscure values for a test (that you'll almost certainly forget by the time you're a licensed physician).
An AI study guide is liable to make mistakes, but the bigger problem here is a prospective physician who can't be bothered to make sure that they had the correct information before acting on it. Ditto for the lawyers or researchers relying on AI to do the work for them (an inappropriate use of AI imo). Throwing a practice test together and drafting legal paperwork/writing an academic piece are planets apart
I get that, but to a degree it's also on the student for not verifying the output either. One of my classmates has dyslexia (he does the flashcard sets) and makes frequent errors. Thankfully our class shares the burden of making study materials because we all act as a filter of sorts for him. Helping him notice the errors before he commits them to memory, and allowing us to have them edited with correct information. Same goes for AI stuff, you gotta double check it. Editing a few lines is still a lot quicker than creating these resources from scratch
Myself and my classmates (respiratory therapy) use AI to put together study guides, flash cards, and practice tests for us, using our lecture recordings, notes, and PowerPoints as reference material. It hasn't hallucinated anything incorrect into our study guides. I'm no fan of LLMs and the like by any means but it's been a huge time saver in this capacity. Less time spent formatting bullshit means more time for studying
I mean sure but... did you read the piece linked? It backs up it's claims. Not gonna sit here and act like I verified every single thing linked in the piece but I checked a good handful and it seems pretty straightforward. FUTO is pretty sketchy at the very least, and there's good reason to consider them a fascist org
Do "Neurotypical" people exist? Seems to me like the classic example of how the average woman has 2.5 children, but you can't find anyone who actually gives birth to 2.5 children.
You're confusing avreages with normative pressures. Neurodivergence wouldn't exist if there wasn't some broadly applicable set of behaviors, pathologies, and cultural standards to compare "abnormal" behaviors against. While true that there is no truly normal person, there is a normative standard applied to social groups that is used appropriately and inappropriately. An appropriate use of this norm allows us to identify groups with similar diversions from the "norm" and find ways to either develop treatment for harmful aspects of these diversions or (ideally) adjust aspects of the normative social standard that are needlessly damaging to the out groups. An inappropriate utilization of social norms excludes outgroups and furthers the already existing harm done to those groups (a part of this is the stereotypes that you mention).
Or you could just deny the existence of this cultural technology, call it an abstraction with no use or foundation in reality, and use that denial to invalidate the struggles of marginalized groups because you're so high off your own farts that you'd rather use semantics and "nuance" to be an overly technical weiner and hide your bigotry with a paper thin veneer of "scrutinizing stereotypes".
To throw a personal anecdote in, men generally, and white men in particular, have usually been the ones to inflict their unsolicited "advice" on all sorts of things in my life. Especially things they haven't personally struggled with and don't really understand. Plenty of white men have "the hustle" and "grindset" mentality too. And they're usually the ones to be the most adamant about it.
The Linux propaganda here got to me about 2 years ago and I switched to Linux mint. Pretty smooth sailing for day-to-day stuff. However, a few days ago I decided that I wanted to try modding fallout new vegas on my computer and that's been a pain in the ass (still trying to figure it out). The problem is that a lot of the default packages in the mint repositories are outdated and cause a lot of more recently updated programs to malfunction. So I've had to figure out how to get updated packages by using the terminal (first time I've needed to open terminal this entire time) and update them one by one, figuring out which new thing is breaking one by one until everything is working.
For that reason, I'd recommend going with a distro that doesn't have as much of a lag between updates if you're planning on doing anything like what I described. There's almost certainly ways to do what I'm trying to do that are less tedious/frustrating in mint, but I don't know what the fuck I'm doing, dont understand most of what I'm reading, and there just isn't much out there for my specific issues.
Despite my gripes, I'm still enjoying Linux more than windows. If something didn't work on windows, and it couldn't be solved with updating drivers or something similar, I'd just give up. Since everything is wide open in Linux, I know that the solution to my problems are achievable if I just do it right. Instead of being told no by my OS, I'm given a list of reasons why something isn't working, and then I can just go and fix it
I'm in school for respiratory therapy and we learned about laplaces law as it relates to alveoli in the lungs. What are the typical applications of laplaces law? Just wondering because I'm drawing a blank on other ways it could be/is used
The elements of fascism could be construed as a childish/immature perception of reality, where the performance/aesthetics of maturity (particularly as perceived by chauvinistic men) is paramount. The examples listed in this post speak to uniformed (i.e childish) views on power, masculinity, and justice. These topics, among others, are sticking points of every flavor of fascism.
I'm not necessarily saying that this means the american population is immature, but our current fascist regime utilizes these tropes (among other elements of american culture) in their rhetoric, propaganda, and policy decisions to influence the population in pursuit of fascist ends. Seeing fascism as immature/childish certainly has validity, but I think the OP fails to fully capture our current political context with this lens. It would be better to see the state of american politics through the perspective of a failing proto-fascist empire metastasizing into a full fledged fascist regime, informed and shaped by its own reactionary propaganda, of which a large amount appears childish upon first glance.
Post that hog