Bike lanes are fine as long as we don't get rid of roads in the process.
Living 10 miles from a city, terrible public transport and chronic pain means I'm not about to use my bike for actual errands.
Before we say "just fix public transport" there is a balance of how much it will cost vs how much it is worth and no, I don't think it will be worth fixing
I don't agree with this practice of planned obsolescence, but aren't cars already their own planned obsolescence? You have to keep giving it fuel, so in terms of the analogy, wouldn't the company just stop selling fuel? You still have the parts, they just no longer function
Yes I'm aware that car manufacturers don't sell the fuel, which causes a problem with my analogy, but I can't see a perfect analogy for this case.
I have 2 days worth of food in my home. 4 days worth of lunch. When the 2 days of food runs out, I buy more on my way home. Same goes for when the lunch runs out. Meaning if I'm caught at a bad time, I'll have 0 food
It absolutely should matter if she did the deed, as that makes her a murderer, but I will concede that if they used corrupt means to convict her it does invalidate the whole process.
There is a very fine balance to be struck here that I don't think I can do justice.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but for things that are made in both Canada and the US, if you increase demand for the version made in Canada, your country benefits, while hurting the US, since less is sold, so less money earned. Citizens are the ones paying tariffs anyway
I agree with all except the "Check out of national politics" part. You cant decide who is President anymore, but you should still keep an eye on what national laws they may pass or should be prevented from passing
I'd take breath income, purely because it's passive. If you ever lose your legs, you lose your income, but if I ever stop breathing, it's no longer my problem that I have no more income
It's more or less the fact that Trump isn't going to do any better down there, so for this particular issue, whomever you vote for, you get the same result. Why not look at the bigger picture then?
Having just read it, it comes down to a CO2 tax on animals in general and not just cows and pigs.
"En CO2-afgift på udledninger fra husdyr. Der indføres en afgift på 300 kroner per ton CO2 i 2030 stigende til 750 kroner per ton CO2 i 2035 med et bundfradrag på 60 procent. Den effektive afgift vil dermed udgøre 120 kroner per ton i 2030 stigende til 300 kroner per ton i 2035."
Posted the actual Danish text in case someone wants to translate into their own native languages in case of specifics.
I'm surprised the agricultural workers agreed to this.
For part two, we don't breed bison and elk in Denmark. Pigs and Cows are pretty much the only animals we breed that we also eat. We have sheeps too, but not in the same proportion.
While I agree with your statement, there is also a difference in how awful we are, between allowing capsized vessels to just take their course and if we deliberately throw migrants overboard, as this post says is happening in Greece.
I think they meant that people do not see people left of the center looking to fix those issues, so it's not surprising that people vote for the right.
Ah fair enough. Thank you for the information