Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
0
Comments
167
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • refreshes frontpage/new for the 60th time today to see if the other shoe has dropped

  • Coping

    Jump
  • Yall can afford therapy???

  • Totally reasonable and not at all a pretext for more Nazi shit

  • I don't recall this conversation ever being about peaceful protests. My point is that we have enough guns, but they do nothing if they're being held by people unwilling to use them. The right is supporting all of this shit, and it either hasn't gotten bad enough or it hasn't gotten personal enough for the left to become willing to resort to violence.

    OP's argument that "we need more guns" is stupid when we're in a country with more guns than people.

    Your argument is stupid because you just assumed that i was saying there should be no guns when i didn't say anything close to that.

  • It's a purity check to not be amped about a guy that actively does the exact behavior that's decried when the right is the perpetrator?

    Being a hypocrite is enlightened centrism now?

  • 🏆

    Here's your award for dumbest take of the day. The solution to violence has literally never been "yeah, everyone should have a gun".

  • I'm going to need you to compile these into a time lapse once the experiment has concluded

  • Not sure I'd call him a "wannabe" fascist at this point. Dude is ignoring the constitution, consolidating control over the media, isolating the US culturally and economically, and has picked at least two out groups to pin blame on while sending one (for now) to concentration camps. He's playing blackout on the fascist bingo card and we're less than a year in.

  • "juicypinkrose" 😂😂😂 I think you might rethink that handle

  • Not supporting the killing of Kirk, supporting the death of Kirk. It's a small but important difference.

  • Tbh, that's kind of a good change in a fucked up way. I'd much rather people be taking out the high profile people that are either directly causing massive societal issues or have the power to make real change. I value literally any child's life more than CK or BT. Kids are innocent, healthcare execs and right wing grifters are not.

    If these people are the root of the issue that leads someone to violence, why should they be exempted from the violence that they caused?

  • Brian Thompson made a fortune denying sick people healthcare. Charlie Kirk made a fortune teaching young men how to hate minorities and that gun violence is necessary.

    Idk man, it seems like maybe doing evil shit increases the chances of someone trying to kill you. I can understand why fox news is concerned.

  • This one won't be the one that gets me, it'll be the ones expressing that CK getting capped was a massive net positive for humanity.

  • Give me the day off work to celebrate every year? Aight.

  • Didn't republicans make truth social and the other rightwing shitholes specifically because "tHeY'rE cEnSoRiNg Us" for saying shit more vile than what they're throwing a fit about now?

    It's almost like they want censorship for everyone but themselves.

  • No, that isn't hate speech it's religious speech which must be protected at all costs. Christianity is under attack from the evil leftists, dontyaknow?

  • Yeah, pretty much

  • More hole

  • I got banned for repeatedly tagging a global warming denier in posts about climate change