When the judge and the prosecution work for the same people, it can cause conflicts of interest, or the appearance of such, and make it seem like the judiciary is not there to be objective and determine the facts.
So there should be two governments just for the sake of having judges and prosecutors coming from separate entities? And which government should be supreme? Who answers to whom?
Why do you think an adversarial court system is the best in the first place?
it's hard to expect them to be objective if the state can retaliate against them for ruling against it, obviously as such or behind the scenes.
What do you mean 'rule against' the state? Isn't the judge an agent of the state? Do you mean a judge should have independence such that they can contradict their mandate?
Whatever gymnastics you're doing in your twisted little head about what you initially said or meant, the analogy RedWizard used is appropriate to the real world situation so you can get fucked.
And you can get fucked twice for projecting yourself onto all of us by way of being a genocide supporter (but :< you cry) coming to troll and acting like we're all just congenitally angry.
Oh hey! It looks like a robust discussion is happening in this post! I wonder if it's about ICE or Pokemon?