Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K

KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24

@ AnarchistsForKamala @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
189
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • and ecological conservation

  • it's not logical, either.

  • And you make this judgement every day as well, even if you refuse to admit it

    an absolutely unfalsifiable claim.

    whatever you are doing over there it isn't science.

  • saying it doesn't make it true. you have presented no proof, so no one should believe you

  • I don't think you have the ability to treat other users as fully human

  • you have no proof for your claim. no one should believe you

  • Nobody can be certain of anyone’s intentions on the Internet,

    except you, apparently, who is certain they can tell a good faith actor from a bad faith actor based solely on whether they have an opinion you have seen or one you agree with

  • the odds that they’re not are vastly greater.

    you are making that up

  • wrong

  • Can you please explain what the difference is between an action being causal of another action vs an action… causing another action to happen?

    i don't think you're capable of understanding cause and effect, so i guess this is done.

  • with zero supporting evidence or reason

    wrong

  • An argument’s a collective series of statements to establish a definite proposition.

    i'm not making an argument. i'm contradicting yours.

  • If this were true, it would lead to the absurd conclusion that hiring a hitman to kill someone would not make you complicit in the act, because, by your logic “they make their own decisions” regardless of who’s paying them to do what.

    again, this is completely disanalagous with buying meat on a shelf.

  • You claimed that purchasing meat has no effect on whether more meat gets produced, because “they make their own decisions.”

    wrong. i said it is not causal.

  • This argument rests on the completely insane premise that paying people to do things does not influence their behavior or make you complicit when they decide to do what you paid them to do.

    wrong

  • making a leap of logic and doubling down doesn't make your position any more sound

  • i'm intimately aware of the price discovery theory you've mentioned, but it does not have any real predictive power, and it makes no claims about how production levels are impacted by markets.

  • to claim that it is ineffective is like claiming that eating healthy makes no difference from eating like shit after doing it for a single day and not seeing amazing results.

    markets don't follow natural law like biology does.

  • if 10% of the population went vegan, demand for those products would fall by 10% and there would be that many less animals killed for it

    i don't know how you can prove this.