Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
163
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Just tried, only pissed myself.

  • Well I did once explain the difference between sex and gender as she seemed confused and was unable to wrap her head around a colleague using they/them, but that led to a slightly vacant yet patronising expression on her face. Also, call me a coward but I’m not going to clap back at my own goddamn boss, I prefer my working days to not be more of a living hell than they already are. Regardless, she’s retired now.

  • I know it’s a really awkward phrasing, but “I had a boss, who was a woman…” sounded even more awkward to me than just “woman boss” 🤷‍♂️.

  • I had a woman boss who would always refer to women as female (like “you know the manager of that department is a female?!”). I’m still not sure how I feel about it.

  • Is that Bread Climp, famous opossum wizard?

  • Thanks for the reply! It just seemed euphemistic to me as cages have a predominantly positive connotation with safety or protection. Roll cages, faraday cages, and shark cages protect those within. Most other cages are for the protection of those outside, which cars obviously aren’t.

    The only negative connotation cages have is animal cruelty or false imprisonment, and even then you sympathise with those within the cage.

    Now say car-nut, petrolhead, or even just driver, and I have clear enough picture painted.

  • Doesn’t quite fit, but I guess. Im curious why the OP chose to use a euphemism though.

  • I give up, what’s a cager?

  • silent internal screaming

  • I’m so happy that there is a Crash bandicoot in the fossil record.

  • Mel Giedroyc has let herself go.

  • Yum

    Jump
  • What a terrible day to have mouths.

  • Jem’Hadar moment.

  • Siphoning off extra revs for powering woke.

  • How many justices do you think there will be if there’s a new one appointed each two years and they are term-limited to 18 years?

  • I politely, yet firmly disagree.

  • Huh! My perception has always been the opposite, but that Wikipedia article appears soundly sourced. Don’t I feel silly?!

    It appears I have been shown who is the boss.

    Anyhow, I hope it’s agreed that the general point I had that there’s historically two different uses of that term and it’s not unreasonable to be confused about them still stands.

    I’ll leave my comment up as-is for context.

  • They are, or rather were. For most of the world, especially in Europe, liberalism means/meant socially liberal, i.e. left wing - based on personal freedom from imposition of others’ values on their personal and social lives. However, in America liberal has (relatively recently, as in 2000’s) become synonymous with neoliberal ideology, which is absolutely not left wing in any traditional sense, focusing on ‘small government’ and freedom of the markets—I guess because pronouncing two extra syllables is too much effort? Idk.

    With the internet this peculiar usage has recently (as in the last 5-10 years) started leaking out of America and is being used in this confusing and ambiguous manner.

    To be fair though, the Overton window has shifted so far right now that liberal (i.e. left of the nominal centre) shares much of the same space as neoliberal. See New Labour, and the current Labour government.

    Edit: Deleted a paragraph that in retrospect was unnecessarily negative.