Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
1
Comments
86
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Thankfully Gnome is ridiculously customisable. The native experience is shit, but installing a few extensions fixes all the issues I had with it at least.

  • These symbols are getting more messy and difficult to decipher... Someone asked me the other day if I had 5g. I looked at my phone and there was no 3g, 4g, or 5g. So, I just said I have VoLTEBlutoothshaky batteryalarmclockkeyupsidedowntriangle62%.

  • Fla???

    Flassachusetts? Flaregon? Flanillois? ...

    Surely, that's not supposed to mean Florida? Did they forget how to spell their own state???

  • You forgot the person standing to the other side saying, "But what about that time when America...!?"

  • Honestly, I consider myself moderately tech savvy. But I also had issues with SecureBoot when installing Linux. It really doesn't help when every single BIOS has different settings and they all want to make everything as poorly worded and unintuitive as humanly possible.

    "Oh, you want an on/off toggle for SecureBoot? Sorry, no. Let's just fuck with you until you either brick your motherboard or somehow manage to install Linux."

    My congratulations! You've managed to get past the most difficult hurdle.

  • Years later, and I'm still with Hillary on this one... WHY IS THERE A GARDEN IN THE SINK!?

  • i.e. cherry picking.

  • The term is applicable because unless you provided those comments in the order you viewed comments in this post (which was the claim of my initial comment), you specifically sought out comments with the bias you were looking for, disregarding comments that did not fit the narrative.

  • Good for you

  • You are either responding to the wrong person or don't know what that word means.

  • Thanks, but I'm not interested in reading a bunch of cherry-picked comments.

    I made no claim that none of the posts the OP was whining about existed, only implied that they were exaggerating as I didn't see a single one while reading every single comment up until I reached OPs.

  • 25 comments in and I haven't seen a single person defend this blatant corruption.

  • No. My argument is that Western media is not biased in support of Israel. When challenged on this point, your argument is to accuse me of craving the death of Palestinians.

    You are an immature child. Honestly sick of this crap. Past time I blocked this community.

  • I'm sorry? Were we talking about whether Western media was biased towards Israel? Are we now discussing the etymology of the word 'bias'?

    Frankly, I'm not interested in playing your game. We are taking about headlines? The headlines by and large are in opposition to Israel, which contradicts the ludicrous claim of the OP.

    I refuse to play sneaky games to switch the dialogue elsewhere. The articles I provided were legitimately as unbiased as I could think of (Duckduckgo, search term 'Israel Lebanon Conflict', in a private tab, English language, consecutive order). They were definitively NOT in support of Israel, which contradicts the silly claim of the OP.

    I accept that most people will refuse to see the nonsensical silliness of the OP's argument. I'm not interested in discussing blame and where it should be directed.

  • Bullshit.

    It's easy to cherry pick articles to generate a false narrative by navigating to the most conservative outlets.

    Why don't you try and search any popular search engine for 'Israel Lebanon News' in a private browser (to remove yourself from a browser bubble) and then try to claim that the wording in Western headlines favours Israel. All I see, in consecutive order of search results is: 'Israel launches first airstrike...', 'Israel forces open fire in Lebanon...', 'UN troops patrol Israel-Lebanon border...', 'Lebanon deploys army on 2nd day...', 'Israel fires on Southern Lebanon...', 'Israel conducts first strike on Lebanon'.

    Note that 4 of these portray Israel as the antagonist, 1 is neutral, and 1 portrays Lebanon as the antagonist.

  • What?

    I only see articles constantly, incessantly, calling out Israel for being the incarnation of evil in the most biased one-sided hypocritical manner possible. I honestly couldn't say the last time I read an article that was even slightly biased in favour of Israel.

    One of these days, I wouldn't mind reading one of these alleged 'Western headlines' (naturally, that is, not in a cherry-picked screenshot), if for nothing else than for a change in perspective. Personally, I don't really have strong opinions either way in the Israel-Hamas-Hezbollah conflict, though I sympathise for all the innocent victims. I truly wish for a return to the Journalistic Creed though; journalists should deliver factual information in as non-biased manner as possible, they shouldn't be acting as politicians trying to manipulate people by twisting words to build their narrative.

    Absolutely sick of reading nonsensical trash like this. Only a fucking blind idiot would believe that 'Western media' as a matter of course favours Israel. I guarantee, for every 1 'Western' headline supporting Israel, there'll be a dozen others decrying them.

  • hi HOW ARE you TODAY?

    i'm pretty GOOD MYSELF!!111!!!!!!

    I TOO like to RANDOMLY SWITCH TO upper case.

    I HOPE YOU RECOVER SOON!

  • Time travel

  • inb4 products that have absolutely no supply chain dependence to China 'somehow' increase in price.