Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H

Hemingways_Shotgun

@ Adderbox76 @lemmy.ca

Posts
14
Comments
1385
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • difficult to rule around

    Jump

  • Well hey...good news Nick. It turns out that the Venn circles of Maga young men and incels form a perfect circle...so you can just stick your dick right through them!

  • Linux traffic has grown 22.4% in PH this year

    Jump

  • Hey. It's been a lonely year. Don't shame me, bro.

  • When they say CachyOS is mostly for newer machines...what's "newer"

    Jump

  • Optimized Repositories for Cachy only have any real effect on newer processors (x86-64-v3 and up). Of course I can still use it on an older machine, but I was asking if my processor (AMD A10 "kaveri") would be new enough to take advantage of those optimized repositories. (my research so far says no....AMD didn't add v3 until the next years processors in 2015)

    You're link actually answered my question, though. So thanks! Don't know why when I searched it wasn't finding that page for myself. Maybe my Google-fu needs some retraining.

  • When they say CachyOS is mostly for newer machines...what's "newer"

    Jump

  • That's another option as well. It's between Endeavour, Cachy, or sticking with Manjaro.

    Usually my primary consideration is community size and/or team size. Too many linux distributions seem great, but have low support and eventually just vanish, so I always try to stick to the "bigger boys". Not saying Endeavour is that, but once upon a time it was the new guy on the block and that's why I've waited to consider it. Same with Cachy. I wait to see if they've proven their staying power before considering them.

  • Pete Hegseth Says the Pentagon's New Chatbot Will Make America 'More Lethal'

    Jump

  • I'll let you hear my new appointment speech. Old man tried to control the world with money. It seems to have been working. The population thought that Shinra would protect them. Work at Shinra, get your pay. If a terrorist attacks, the Shinra army will help you. It looks perfect on the outside. But, I do things differently. I'll control the world with fear. It takes too much to do it like my old man. A little fear will control the minds of the common people. There's no reason to waste money on them.

    President Rufus

  • Dispute

    Jump

  • Clearly hubby got caught with a side-piece in the nest when mom came home early.

  • aging well

    Jump

  • What really tells it for the scam that it is would be to overlay that with this dipshit's personal wealth over the same period.

  • Pete Hegseth Says the Pentagon's New Chatbot Will Make America 'More Lethal'

    Jump

  • American "Patriots" are fucking weird, man. Like... "You can't disrespect the flag, but here's a snot-rag with the flag on it."

    You people are nuts.

  • Pete Hegseth Says the Pentagon's New Chatbot Will Make America 'More Lethal'

    Jump

  • They're emotionally stunted bullies who equate animosity and fear. Just like bully will assume that you're afraid of him if you ignore him, the US thinks "If they hate us, they must fear us, therefore it means we are strongest and bestest."

    The concept of "soft power", which is what the US used to trade on, is completely alien to these idiots. All they know about "might makes right" is to use naked displays of it and then call themselves strong

  • What YouTube channel to you has degraded in time?

    Jump

  • The big big exception to this for me is the guys at Red Letter Media.

    Even once they got big, they're still just shitty b-movie lovers who don't really give a crap about an algorithm. And that's why I love 'em.

  • What YouTube channel to you has degraded in time?

    Jump

  • FilmRiot

    Used to be a fun channel about DIY filmmaking. They would replicated a number of things using DIY gear (how to make a dolly track, etc...)

    After a while, it became entirely about replicating digital effects in After Effects and stuff like that, and when they do talk about hardware, it's sponsored content about gear that is far out of any amateur filmmaker's budget.

  • Millions of children and teens lose access to accounts as Australia’s world-first social media ban begins

    Jump

  • Since she had been identified as under 16, they feared “her friends will keep using Snapchat to talk and organise social events and she will be left out”.

    FFS, we all got along just fine and dandy with group-chats via text message. We weren't fucking cavemen.

    The fact that this is her fear (and the fact that it's a legitimate fear) proves just how much controls like this are needed. It's literally digital crack that they think there's simply no other way to communicate anymore (both her and her friends)

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • This is literally the only unflattering photo of him I've ever seen. He looks like a mob enforcer berating his lawyer.

  • Journalist Reveals FBI Is Offering a “Bounty” for Reporting “Anti-Trump Thought”

    Jump

  • It takes very little to get that theme song stuck in my head. Thanks.

  • Journalist Reveals FBI Is Offering a “Bounty” for Reporting “Anti-Trump Thought”

    Jump

  • There's a weird disconnect between the left and the right where MAGA especially is so slavishly cultish that their guys can do no wrong. Whereas on the left, we generally have the critical thinking skills to admit that our guys aren't always doing the right thing.

  • NSFW

    How do you feel about porn ?

    Jump

  • Whatever someone wants to do with their body is up to them (within legal limits)

    To the people who say "she's selling her body", I say this:

    So are you. So am I. So is everybody. A miner or oil rigger is selling their body to be used as labour for 10 hours a day.

    An accountant is selling their body to sit at a desk and crunch numbers for ten hours a day.

    We're all selling our bodies to corporations every day in exchange for a paycheque. If a person is comfortable using nudity for it, more power to 'em.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • "Oh shit! That bear is attacking! Quick, you go get the emergency basketball hoop and I'll bring the parrot."

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • Actually you're the one looking fucking stupid, here.

    The idea that we don't have the right to privacy in public was first argued in regards to legitimate use of cameras in public and when a video maker does (or doesn't) need to get your permission.

    If you're caught on camera incidentally during a news story about a house fire. Or you're in the background of a surveillance tape of a robbery they're showing on the news. Or traffic cameras, or cop dash cams. Legitimate uses where public interest is a priority.

    If a filmmaker is shooting a scene on location (for an example of the other direction), and they happen to catch some members of the public, they need to get those people to sign a consent form, or else they can't use the footage. This is the law, I believe, EVERYWHERE that has ever argued this in court.

    So yes, while there are legitimate reasons that a person's privacy is considered able to be suspended (such as news in the public interest), contributing to some incel's spank-bank isn't one of those reasons. And you're a fucking idiot if you don't grasp that concept.

  • Woman Hailed as Hero for Smashing Man's Meta Smart Glasses on Subway

    Jump

  • Actually there is an expectation of privacy.

    The argument that "if you're in public and are filmed" it's not an invasion of your privacy specifically relates to things that are considered "legitimate public insterest",. If you're tangentially caught on a news-report about a house fire, or an event, or something like that, for example. Of if you're in the background on a cop's dash cam during a traffic stop, etc...

    Beyond that, no one can use your image without your consent. There's a reason that members of the press need credentials and will usually walk around in a jacket that says PRESS on it; so that people know that they are in a place where they are likely to be recorded and can move away from it.

    There's a reason that, if a movie is shooting a scene and they catch a few background people, they have to send a poor production assistant running around with release forms so that those people can give their permission...other wise the film can't use the footage.

    Some incel recording a woman for his own personal spank-bank doesn't fall into either of those categories. And anyone who is trying to claim that they're all the same thing is a fucking creep.