Skip Navigation

Posts
12
Comments
81
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • you are involved in the deal, because advertisers pay by how many times the ad is displayed (or clicked). just like how you are involved in the deal between the distributor and cinema, because the pay depends on how many tickets you buy.

  • hmm, you can donate compute?

  • by "the act" I meant things that are more popularly understood as piracy. even if torrenting cracked Assassin's Creed was legalized, I'd still call torrenting cracked video games piracy.

  • not exactly sure what you mean. you could send me a link and i'll give you a link to its photon UI. it handles image posts

  • If one of the pirate parties succeeded in implementing their platform, I'd still call the act piracy there.

  • That makes the piracy a lot more ethical and probably something I support.

  • i mean if not targeted, how is it any more brainwashing than arguments online?

    or maybe i'm just biased against being affected by it because i've got a really frugal family culture

  • but to the website's wallet

  • i agree; you're making copies: not displacing any original inventory

  • could you elaborate on the verge?

  • the analogue there would be clicking on the ad. google ads, probably the most popular single platform, has two kinds of ad payment: per-click and per-impression. by just receiving it and throwing it away you get rid of the former, but by blocking ads you get rid of both. (there's also the fact that most people do not block ads, while most people do throw away junk mail)

    and if everyone throws away junk mail, there's still money, because the post office got paid to deliver it. same goes for not blocking ads but not looking at them.

  • curiously, the only time i've ever gotten infected (besides wannacry) was through a torrent

  • these are as rare as non-tracking ads, and my approaches of<1. i don't use my web browser much on mobile (that distance probably fries my eyes anyways) 2. i use µBO and whitelist sites on my normal computer>probably help me avoid that anyways

  • most people don't block ads not because they think that it harms someone but because they don't know that it's possible.

    I agree.

  • not paying attention to ads is very different from blocking the ads

  • to watch BBC, not mute ads, no?

  • i also like to smell armpits

  • post office gets paid either way, website doesn't. you're describing looking away from the website's ads while your ad-blocker's off.

  • I believe that advertising without trackers is ethical.