Commoners have 4hp. So, for reference, 4 successful baby scratches drops an average, normal person to zero HP and they are rendered unconscious and have about a 40% chance of death if they don't receive medical aid.
But STR/DEX would be 1 bc 0 is not possible. Would have a -5 to hit - so 30% on an AC10 unarmored commoner.
I think this means you have a 0.3% chance of permadeath in an encounter with a baby if they only make 4 attacks and you don't hit back and they don't keep scratching your unconscious body.
If they attack you 10 times (1 minute of scratching w/ 6 sec turns), there is a 20% chance they land 4 scratches on you and you have a 40% chance to permadie once downed - so 8% chance of permadeath in one 10 turn encounter with a baby with the same stipulations as above.
The community was 100% into the dick cutting though. And the animal torturing. Therapists probably would recommend even more dick cutting and animal torturing
I mean, in a world with a god like that, the only rational course of action would be to do what they say. The concept of truly infinite suffering makes that the only rational choice.
That's why piety is a virtue for Christians, first and foremost. Being a "good person" by their metrics is a byproduct of obeying god since god determines what is good.
Oh for sure. But just looking at it at face value, it brings up some weird questions about the metaphysics involved.
Considering the omnipotence factor, he could've just let them know not to sacrifice people some other way, too.
Of course it's just a myth meant to instruct people in virtues (piety, obedience, not sacrificing people) but there are a great many folks who view the bible as literally true and for whom this line of argumentation would pose some issues.
He didn't even reveal it (maybe), according to mythology.
omnipotent and omnipresent (and omni-benevolent?) God
created angels, without free will, to do his bidding - for... reasons? (He didn't need them to bc of the whole omnipotent thing, but maybe he just likes their vibe.)
God decides to fuck with Abraham in a bunch of terrible ways for essentially no reason. This culminates in god ordering him to sacrifice his son Isaac.
Abraham complies, binds Isaac like a sacrificial animal, and draws his knife to attempt to kill Isaac after begging and pleading with god to not make him do this.
an angel (who doesn't have free will, mind you) was watching and called out to stop Abraham.
Abraham decides that since angels are messengers of god, he doesn't have to kill Isaac. He finds a ram and kills it instead.
So either:
God, omnipotent and knowing the contents of Abraham's heart, unnecessarily ordered him to murder his kid - knowing he would do so and planning to intervene using an angel. In which case he is omnipotent and unnecessarily cruel.
God, omnipotent and knowing the contents of Abraham's heart, unnecessarily ordered him to murder his kid - knowing he would do so and the angel intervened without god being able to stop the angel. So angels have free will and/or god can't control them (is not omnipotent) and god is unnecessarily cruel.
God, NOT omnipotent and therefore ignorant to the contents of Abraham's heart, necessarily ordered him to murder his kid to test his faith, and was either stopped by an angel or stopped abraham using the angel.
I went to a notoriously conservative university - one of the most conservative in the country. A lot of my family members had gone there, too. I got the same major as my mom.
She blames the school for turning me into a socialist.
In actuality, of course, I just: learned how to think better, read lots of books, and was surrounded by shitty conservative people for 4 years.
Go to the doctor. Especially if you are in otherwise OK shape and your capacity for exercise doesn't seem to improve with practice. Being unable to walk for one hour without severe fatigue is pretty good evidence of exercise intolerance.
Exercise intolerance is basically an inability to perform physical activities that someone your age typically would be able to.
This can be evidence of various underlying health issues (heart, lungs, muscle disorders, nutritional deficiencies).
Giving specific interview feedback in writing is legally fraught, so it is not typically done. It's common courtesy to say "sorry but we went with someone else", but most places don't bother which is shitty.
As someone who works with recruiters literally every day, that is absolutely bullshit. It is 100% normal and expected to discuss compensation.
There are some no-nos, like don't just lie to them blatantly about your comp or job experience. That's kinda shitty - especially if you get caught and then double down on an obvious lie. What are they supposed to do with that? Feel free to embellish a bit, but if you get caught in a lie it will sour negotiations (for understandable reasons)
It's fine to withhold info, of course, but they may be able to give you MORE money if you can give them details of your competing offer, etc. Or your current compensation IF you know it's already competitive/high - if you're underpaid or are unsure or going in for a higher level job, better to let them guess.
You can also hold off on disclosing anything about your pay (actual or desired) until later on once you've passed the interviews, but also it sucks to invest the time and stress of interviews only to find out they won't pay you what you need for the job. But negotiations will be anchored to your stated compensation (actual or expected)
Negotiating in good faith to get the best deal you can is not and should not be looked negatively on by any serious employer. If anything, they see you negotiating as a signal that you are confident in the value of your labor/skills
Weird plot for the Braveheart reboot