Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
12
Comments
178
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I'm not one for labeling music in genres, so I'll write my answer in two parts: the "canonical" information, with artists documented as "IDM" artists on Wikipedia, and the "personal" information, which I think fits the so called "IDM" genre, but don't quote me on that, I wouldn't really know. This is "best effort".

    Canonical answer:

    Orbital, aphex twin, and boards of Canada come to mind, but that's more for the curious casual reader of this thread, as I'm sure you already know them. Also John Tejada, Carbon Based Lifeforms, Moderat, which are less known.

    Personal answer:

    I dunno if I would say that they fit in "IDM", but I really enjoy the music of the artist Siriusmo. Also (in no particular order, all this could be hit or miss for you, so don't dismiss it all because you don't like one) Sasha, Kaito, Ernest Saint Laurent, Vessels, Barker & Baumecker, and pretty much everything under the labels monkeytown and Kompakt (respectively based in Berlin and Koln). I'm not sure where the genre lines stop tho, so you might add Nick Warren, Phil k, Dave seaman, John Digweed, etc. to that. Labels renaissance (the British one) and Global Underground.

  • Last reference I was able to find was from the 60s.

  • Notable flatulists: two Brits and a French. I dunno you, but they seem full of shit.

  • Nope, it is real. It is slang, but real. The actual phrasing is "avoir du lait sur le feu". As in "Allez! J'ai du lait sur le feu!". But it is rather outdated.

  • The essence of that article can be summarised in:

    • The Streisand effect is helping the news outlets that meta censored.
    • We can all move away from meta, and they will essentially go away.
  • Honestly, if the makefile is well written, I will take that any day. Good makefiles are 😙👌.

    They are extremely rare, tho...

    I guess the solution would be a declarative language that compiles to makefiles. So that people don't have to know the nitty gritty of writing good makefiles, and can just maintain a file of their dependencies and settings...

  • Me want. You should host a cooking show on aNONradio. 😋

  • Larger might be acceptable too, not sure

    It should.

  • Also, work off of the copy. Never touch the source.

  • A then C. If you know how to do it[^1] ofc. If you don't, then assume it is. Very different situation if the weapon is loaded. Both require C, but one much more intensely than the other.

    [^1]: Hopefully /s is obvious enough here, but I'm not taking chances: /s, OK?

  • Usually that's about when I strace the process before running it through gdb...

  • Yes, I get that point, but I also think that it's tempting for the privacy-minded novice to think "the less information I provide, the better!", while in actuality, it is better to provide "more" information: the most common UA, even if it means lying about your featureset. In this case, truly, more is less.

  • Oh gee, I wasn't aware there was more to it than the UA. Thanks for opening my eyes.

    Edit: I checked your link, most of the parameters on the test require client side execution. That (client side tracking) is absolutely unrelated to what (server side tracking) I was talking about, and is something you can control (by not allowing JavaScript, for example). Please do not confuse the two. There is literally nothing you can do against server side tracking.

  • Yeah, make your user agent absolutely unique. Too much entropy will surely confuse the shit out server side HTTP Header tracking. 😬

  • This isn't about you. Your data is key in making other, relevant people stand out. Why relevant? Because they resist. Because they aren't depressed, they are fighting back. And whatever the reason that drives them, they can be manipulated. By compromising their anonymity. By making literally everyone else a "known variable". With your help.

  • Yeah totally merge everything, people like a good spaghetti salad.

  • If you can't count to 3, that's a you problem, dude...

  • So, lemme get this straight. We fucked up the climate with industrialisation and uncontrolled capitalism, through energy consumption. Now, the #1 industrial company (that's two for two, if you're counting) in chip making is using one of the most energy (and there we go, 100% 🥳) intensive technology at our disposal to try and eventually have a shot at maybe keeping the climate in somewhat of a check... Am I the only one seeing this? 😶

    That's the energy equivalent of giving every kid and teacher guns to "stop school shootings". 🙃