Similarly, when a movie scientist/engineer insists a thing can't be done, until an authority figure chews them out/threatens them. Then, there's suddenly a breakthrough.
I think their world view just needs more information. Bill Gates is a horrible person, who has had an excellent PR team whitewashing his name for at least a decade. And unlike Elon Musk, he doesn't step out from behind the PR team's cover.
We just need to keep bringing it to people's attention.
To begin with, instead of "Italy has a major issue with domestic violence", would it be more fair to say "The Italian government sees domestic violence as a major issue"?
My post was a response to all the "it's still just murder!" comments; because per your first source, Italian domestic violence does largely target women, and that does need addressed.
But it sounds like your problem with this legislation is that the government is using it to prop themselves up and make themselves look virtuous while they target other disadvantaged populations. Would you mind expanding on that? My knowledge of Italian current events is woefully lacking!
I'm reading a lot of responses here that seem to rhyme with the "White lives matter!" responses to the BLM movement.
As was the case then, what seems to be getting missed by those saying this is the context. Italy has a major issue with domestic violence, including spousal murder. From the sound of it, it's usually women who are the victims. Thus, a new law to target wife abusers specifically.
There may be some merit to debating whether this is an effective move or not, I'm not up on my research there; but let's not deny that they see a need, and are attempting to address it.
I'm honestly not clear if this is a sarcastic comment or not.
For myself - those all seem like gender neutral virtues, viewed separately and together. I don't know that I agree with each one as a virtual, but I don't see anything that would or should apply to one gender more than another.
I remember looking at the change in overall death rate for US citizens after the first year of lockdowns; when people were saying COVID deaths were being over reported.
As I recall, the last time we had such a large spike in overall death rate was in 1918 - when we were dealing with the Spanish flu and WW1.
I think a few who were good at working trump in his first administration did do this too - but as you say, there's fewer than you'd think; and I think when his handlers figured out this was happening, they started scheduling Republicans to meet him right after to "correct" his mindset.
The US probably has more people trying to get more money than other places due to cultural issues; but even as many people as do want more money, it seems rare to want others to have less.
Speaking for myself, I just want money to make sure that food, shelter, and medical needs are taken care of for my family. Beyond that, I actually don't want more than what I have.
Weren't some of the US helicopters that were captured in Ukraine remotely disabled? I seem to remember a Russian general having a hissy fit about it early in the invasion.
Wasn't there just a story yesterday, where they keep finding hanging "suicides" that were hogtied? Trying to find it again, thought that was in the camps
You sigh, but... Porn is the choice of the bonobo, not the chimpanzee, no?
Besides, the atomic bomb isn't really a fair comparison - we set up a whole crash program in wartime to figure out how to make a big weapon, of course we used it as a weapon first!
Yeah, like I said, it sounds like normal maintenance is enough to keep up with the "typical" use case. We live in an area with a lot of trees, and had nowhere to park it where debris didn't clog it fast, apparently. They did recommend we park it in the garage at one point, but... the car was longer than our garage! Seemed silly to renovate our house to expand our garage when the problem was that the car wasn't built to shed dirty rainwater safely, so we sold it and got a shorter car instead.
I want to say 2014-2016? It was bizarre, but the dealership didn't seem to have any notion that it was a real problem. Just kept hearing back "Oh yeah, sounds like it needs blown out again" whenever it happened.
And it was never a problem right after it was serviced, just in the month or two before it was due to be serviced again. It seemed like there was a SOP that could address it, it just required frequent maintenance to be able to handle rain falling on the roof.
Man, we had a Subaru outback for a while. Still miss the space, but the interior flooded every time it rained.
Turns out, the roof doesn't actually have a place to shed water externally - it drains through the car before going out the bottom. Apparently part of regular maintenance involves cleaning out that channel... and where we live has enough tree debris that it always clogged up early, and backed up into the passenger compartment.
Now, I don't know a lot about car design... but draining the roof through the body of the car, in such a way that you have to have a service tech see to it to keep it weatherproof? Makes me wonder what else might be waiting to go wrong.
I remember a lot more of this kind of encouragement from churchgoers, and it was usually well-intentioned there too.