Conversely, not being on a platform with a very considerable amount of their current userbase could cost them massive amounts of subscribers, and possibly allow competitors to take their place.
It's been milked endlessly but definitely not disrespected a la Sonic. You know when you pick up one of these you're in for a good time. It's the kind of reputation Nintendo knows it relies on.
The GTA leakers problem is that he would use any sort of leniency he could to initiate further attacks. The dude performed an attack while already in police custody,
Ah yes, everyone who disagrees is a shill. How productive.
The funny thing is, the people in the comments have done a much better job than you at providing actual arguments as to why Wayland isn't great.
But here's the thing about Wayland: it can and will get better. Unlike X11, the codebase of the various Wayland compositors isn't 30 years of hack after hack making it an unmaintainable mess.
If we want to make desktop experiences that rival Windows and MacOS, including future versions, we have to make these kinds of changes. If we want to adapt to changing computing landscapes, we have to make these changes.
Wayland isn't perfect but the Linux desktop world is in a much better place with it than without it.
Since I use a password manager, it’s quite easy to manage, just like different passwords for each account. No difference.
Yeah, but for the actual mail, do you forward the emails to one address? Or do you set up Outlook/Thunderbird to sync all of them? Manually checking all of them would be quite laborious and you might miss the occasional important email if you don't check regularly.
I literally am a security expert and the only thing I change between accounts is my password, which I put in a password manager.
With that said I do have other usernames/email addresses that I use if I'm doing something that I don't want attached to my public persona. These can also be stored in the password manager so all is still good.
But individual email addresses per account is overkill and a management nightmare, with a very minimal security tradeoff. I'm not exactly expecting a state sponsored attack on my email after all.
Someone would need to know what accounts you have (which are not stored on my email)
Aren't they?
Access to your emails means access to your messages. If I see you get a lot of Amazon email, I can reasonably assume you have an Amazon account.
Most services send you emails at least on registration.
then know the password to access them.
Nope. Because I have your email account. And the usual method for resetting a password is via an email sent to your email account. That I've already compromised.
That’s if they are able to bypass the 2fa I have set on each account that offers it.
That last part is a pretty big asterisk. Sites that offer it are in the minority still. That also assumes your 2FA method isn't email.
And it’s also too bad for them, because I use different email address per account, which can be rotated and changed (if the damn site allows you to update your email).
You do realise the average person will never do this, right?
So if we're not talking about ISPs sending this out, then the reason that remote access gets turned on by default is incase the company sysadmin couldn't physically get to the device, and they assumed the company had a firewall.
Companies almost always prioritise OOTB setup and operationality over security when it comes to defaults.
Because these routers went out to everybody. Tech heads and idiots alike. It is far easier for ISPs to simply remote in than rely on the consumer who may be an idiot.
Because those are regular jobs and skills? Okay, maybe not COBOL nowadays but still.