Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
2
Comments
159
Joined
3 wk. ago

  • In Dallas, you can get one at Sam's Club or Costco for $5.

  • And "old" in this case means "cooked this morning".

  • Rotisserie chicken is like the absolute cheapest food a person can buy.

  • They were so... Innocent.

    Like, everyone trusted everyone. Like, sure perfect stranger online, I don't mind telling you my real name, home address, and age. What's the harm?

  • I jump between social networks every few years. My social network path has gone from AOL chat groups, to Yahoo News groups, to Facebook for a few years, to Twitter, to Mastodon, to Reddit.

    Last week I decided to test Lemmy out. Best thing I can say about it is that it's not any worse than all the others. Which is a pretty good compliment really, considering the resources and network advantages that all the others have.

  • NATO is one of those instances where I generally agree with Trump on the issue at hand, and then strongly disagree with him on the solutions to the issue.

    Like going back to his first administration, I actually agreed with Trump that NATO is a bad deal for America, and also even a bad deal for the other NATO nations. But the solution back then should have been a slow 10-15 year dissolution of NATO. Give Europe time to reorganize themselves, and then end the cold war era alliance. If we has started that process in 2016, Europe would be ten years further along in their own self reliance.

    (Where Trump got everything wrong was that instead of actually developing a realistic plan for the dissolution of NATO, he just used the threat of America immediately pulling out to extort our friends.)

  • Of course we were joking. I kind of thought that would be obvious.

  • You are right. I should just deal with it.

  • Europe would be better off just developing their own weapons systems rather than trying to hack a 35.

  • "Yes, HR, I need to file a complaint. I'm told by all the women here that I'm supposed to be making more than them but that doesn't actually seem to be the case. Will you please look into addressing that discrepancy?"

  • Any computer can be jailbroken if you have complete access to it.

    The question is more, "do you really want to fly a hacked jet"?

  • "Men aren't relevant".

    @whaleross@lemmy.world is right. It is the ultimate acceptance.

    Welcome to the club, boys. Now you are on your own. Enjoy the privileged life!

  • Trans men are men.

    So they can just get over it.

  • Scouting America is a nearly completely volunteer organization. Their technology is generally about 20 years behind because it's all pieced together by volunteers that "kinda done something like this for my company once".

  • This is clearly fake. You can make an LLM say whatever you want it to say. This one is not even funny.

  • I'm just talking about a human capability standpoint. Maybe over time a person just develops the stamina to do it, but I'm pretty wiped after a solid 9-hour day. Honestly, my productivity collapses after about 5 hours of solid focused work.

  • I honestly can't imagine how someone could work 9-9-6.

    That blows my mind.

  • I'm aware of that case, and if you read the language of the bill it doesn't address that situation very well.

    That case is a weird one because I actually think both sides, the student and the graduate assistant grader, were wrong. And ultimately I think the GA was more wrong because the GA held the position of authority in the situation. I generally think that those in authority should be held to more strict standards.

    In that specific case that you, there was a very clear scoring rubric published that the GA was supposed to follow. (You can find the rubric published online.) There is no possible way a rational person could read the grading rubric and conclude the student deserved a 0. Yes, it was a very stupidly written essay, but it wasn't a zero -not if you follow the published rubric. The student was given a zero only because of religious discrimination. The grader should have followed the rubric. If the grader has followed the rubric then the student still would have likely failed the assignment, but the grader would have been able to justify the grade and would probably have avoided getting disciplined.

    That's my position on that. I'm sure you disagree and believe the student was 100% at fault.

  • Food storage is like the whole point of agriculture.