What would that prove that the SC ruling from that article hasn’t already proven?
it could help you understand that us supreme court doesn't rule behind us borders. whether it actually would, i have no idea.
Admittedly it’s hard to review the exchange after the majority of your comments have been removed.
i understand you are trying unconventional attack vectors, but 2 out of 5 is not a majority, swetie. i see you are as good in math as you are in law. i am done with this discussion, bye.
It is mindblowing to me that anyone would think you can really opt out and they will respect that.