• lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah, they invented typesetting in China long before Europe, but they had to prepare characters for each run because of amount of possible characters, the letters were pottery, and it didn’t seem like very useful thing so it was abandoned after the inventor’s death.

    At least that’s what I heard, it might be a retcon for PR purposes

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      Not a retcon at all! Though use of moveable type in China did continue past its inventor’s death, it didn’t acquire the same prominence or revolutionize printing the way that it did when invented in Europe.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Well, TIL, still I think it really highlights that some ideas need specific circumstances to create an impact

        • BuccaneerScientist@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          This reminds me of Connections with James Burke (i only saw the reboot), that explores how breakthroughs have depended on other semi-related ideas and technology.

      • Klear@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        This reminds me how setting prints letter-by-letter was time consuming, so the printers had common words or even whole phrases ready too. It was called stereotype.

        In France they called it cliché