• kn33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Im really confused why people think TPM needs to be involved in anyway when using LUKS.

    Because it’s convenient

    • vexikron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its not though, it requires a ton of extra work to set up, isn’t necessary, doesn’t allow you to do anything you can’t do without it.

      • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You didn’t even know what it was how exactly do you know how much work it is to implement? Its about to be built into the Ubuntu installer.

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        doesn’t allow you to do anything you can’t do without it.

        That’s false. It allows you to not need a password to unlock the volume at boot.

        • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They correctly point out elsewhere that you could just store the unlock on an unencrypted portion of drive itself.

          Yes, I know.