• LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure but the same could be true for e.g. India. But the gist of the article makes no allowance for that. It frames the whole issue as aggression by China. I lack understanding about the history of their borders, but I do understand how propaganda works. But criticize the propaganda and you’re called a dissident and tankie. What does that tell you?

    • Visstix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      The article frames it as defending their border, but also states that 12 of the new villages are on disputed territory. I don’t see any propaganda here, which part do you mean?

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Anti-china = propaganda

        If they’re bitching about being called a tankie, there’s probably a reason.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t see any propaganda here, which part do you mean?

        Ok I’ll try to answer that seriously.

        I mean building villages in areas claimed by other countries is kind of a dick move huh.

        The existence of the article itself and the framing makes it clear that the spotlight is on what China is doing. Not on India or US. And no, it’s not just me, you yourself interpreted the article as intended: China is being aggressive by invading areas claimed by other countries.

        The framing makes it clear that claims by China are not even to be considered as legitimate - obviously they have no claim and obviously they are sneaky. This is a clear western bias.

        What I see here is a dispute between China and India (and nepal etc). I am NOT in favor of China or their policies. But why is this world news? Do those countries need our help in sorting out their problems? What are we supposed to do?

        And THAT is the push towards “war” or “encircling” China. And this isn’t the only article I’ve seen in this vein. For example China’s reactions to joint maneuvers between US and Taiwan are framed as threats and aggression from China. This isn’t a question of right or wrong or good vs evil for me, it’s simply a question of who’s home turf you are on and how to reduce tensions. The US does not have the moral standing see e.g. Iraq invasion and WMDs. But it seems we have learned nothing.

        So why care? Lefties complain about too high defense spending, but articles like this provide the fertile ground for a general feeling of fear about enemies that could sneak up and attack us if we’re not vigilant and spend. And this fuels the arms race of the other side.