This + DeArrow. DeArrow replaces clickbaity titles and thumbnails with better titles submitted by the community. I wouldn’t ever use youtube without it again. With this setup I don’t even want to watch most videos anymore, which is a good thing, because let’s be real, youtube is a big waste of time.
I see people say this a lot, especially on the fediverse, and it makes me wonder why people think youtube is a “waste of time” when youtube’s uses are what the user makes of it.
I primarily use youtube for learning things. There are so many thousands of hours of useful, educational content on youtube that I find the suggestion that the entire platform is useless clickbait to be reductive and disingenuous.
Sure, there are channels I watch for typical mind-numbing content like Let’s Plays and such, but I wouldn’t suggest that youtube is wholly a waste of time just because there’s plenty of mindless content on it.
Just like Reddit or Lemmy, I can create an account and subscribe to a bunch of dumb shitposting communities, but I can also subscribe to a bunch of interesting hobbyist/intrigue communities.
Well, of course you are right. The problem is that for many people (including me)
it is hard to use it in a way that actually brings value, because
it is just too easy to spend hours on there without getting anything in return.
I also think that it is highly subjective what can be considered “good” or “bad”
content. When it comes to educational content, I also would consider it
a waste of time. Sure, if I have a real life problem and the solution
happens to be described in a youtube video, there is nothing wrong with watching it. But often times I was just like “Oh, this could be useful at some
point in the future” and at the end of the video I could hardly remember
what it was about.
I also don’t think that “mindless” content is inherently bad. If it helps someone
to relax, go for it. I always felt worse afterwards.
Saying youtube would be a big waste of time in general is indeed reductive, but I think
for many people it actually is, because it is just not designed to be
used to bring you value. The only objective is that you spend as many hours
on their platform as possible.
I’m still of the mind that I can just fast forward through those sections. It’s not particularly egregious or annoying imo. Just hit that right arrow a few times and boom.
Reminder to support creators in other ways if you’re going to use this.
Edit: similarly, if you can afford it kick a few bucks to your Lemmy instance. We’re about freedom as in speech, not as in freeloading, people. The whole reason the internet shifted to being ad and data collection based after the dotcom bubble is because no one wants to pay for anything.
A main reason youtube is so successful as an advertising product is their detailed metrics. Virtually every sponsor will want to see each video’s metrics which show retention during different parts of the video. It would be the same as putting the ad at the end of an hour long video; if they see a huge drop off where almost no one sees the ad, they may decide the creator didn’t fulfill their end of the contract, or pay them proportionally to the retention during the ad.
Why would a sponsor pay for an ad if they know nobody will watch? Its not magic money out of nowhere; the sponsor has to come out net positive or else they stop sponsoring.
Thing is, the way a company determines if a sponsorship is working is by using offer codes. If no one is using an offer code, the company is going to assume that that sponsorship isn’t working out and might terminate the deal.
I agree, ads suck, but a lot of good content just wouldn’t exist otherwise, because their viewers don’t want to fund it. If you help fund it, then maybe they don’t need to have sponsorships.
I guess you only know about the channels who cater to the lowest common denominator? That tracks.
Corridor Digital and LTT optionally let you use their own paid platforms to view everything without ads.
Channel 5 will sometimes run a sponsor, sometimes not based on patreon support.
I only watch Atrioc’s 10-15m marketing videos, but in the last year I’ve seen him run one sponsor.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Captain Disillusion or DIY Perks run a sponsor segment.
Kurzgesagt and Mark Rober only run ads for their own merch at this point.
Internet Shaquille and Girlfriend Reviews always put the ad at the end to make it as easy as possible to skip.
Zach Freedman makes great stuff and is thankful to his patreon subs, but is clear about why he still needs sponsorships to afford what he does. Same for Simone Giertz who is trying to get her own product company off the ground, but it’s not profitable.
Yeah, it’s unfortunate how dependent on ads everything is, but the reality is it gets funding, and there is a lot of actually useful, educational content that leverages that.
Sponsorblock for YouTube. It automatically skips over parts of videos where they try to get you to play Raid Shadow Legends.
This + DeArrow. DeArrow replaces clickbaity titles and thumbnails with better titles submitted by the community. I wouldn’t ever use youtube without it again. With this setup I don’t even want to watch most videos anymore, which is a good thing, because let’s be real, youtube is a big waste of time.
I see people say this a lot, especially on the fediverse, and it makes me wonder why people think youtube is a “waste of time” when youtube’s uses are what the user makes of it.
I primarily use youtube for learning things. There are so many thousands of hours of useful, educational content on youtube that I find the suggestion that the entire platform is useless clickbait to be reductive and disingenuous.
Sure, there are channels I watch for typical mind-numbing content like Let’s Plays and such, but I wouldn’t suggest that youtube is wholly a waste of time just because there’s plenty of mindless content on it.
Just like Reddit or Lemmy, I can create an account and subscribe to a bunch of dumb shitposting communities, but I can also subscribe to a bunch of interesting hobbyist/intrigue communities.
How to reduce time on Youtube or make it more enjoyable
If you are being intentional about its use, then you can get a lot out of it. But for some, maybe even most, YouTube is a distraction.
Well, of course you are right. The problem is that for many people (including me) it is hard to use it in a way that actually brings value, because it is just too easy to spend hours on there without getting anything in return.
I also think that it is highly subjective what can be considered “good” or “bad” content. When it comes to educational content, I also would consider it a waste of time. Sure, if I have a real life problem and the solution happens to be described in a youtube video, there is nothing wrong with watching it. But often times I was just like “Oh, this could be useful at some point in the future” and at the end of the video I could hardly remember what it was about. I also don’t think that “mindless” content is inherently bad. If it helps someone to relax, go for it. I always felt worse afterwards.
Saying youtube would be a big waste of time in general is indeed reductive, but I think for many people it actually is, because it is just not designed to be used to bring you value. The only objective is that you spend as many hours on their platform as possible.
deleted by creator
I’m still of the mind that I can just fast forward through those sections. It’s not particularly egregious or annoying imo. Just hit that right arrow a few times and boom.
Reminder to support creators in other ways if you’re going to use this.
Edit: similarly, if you can afford it kick a few bucks to your Lemmy instance. We’re about freedom as in speech, not as in freeloading, people. The whole reason the internet shifted to being ad and data collection based after the dotcom bubble is because no one wants to pay for anything.
You know creators get paid for the sponsor right? Not for if people watch that part or not.
A main reason youtube is so successful as an advertising product is their detailed metrics. Virtually every sponsor will want to see each video’s metrics which show retention during different parts of the video. It would be the same as putting the ad at the end of an hour long video; if they see a huge drop off where almost no one sees the ad, they may decide the creator didn’t fulfill their end of the contract, or pay them proportionally to the retention during the ad.
Why would a sponsor pay for an ad if they know nobody will watch? Its not magic money out of nowhere; the sponsor has to come out net positive or else they stop sponsoring.
Thing is, the way a company determines if a sponsorship is working is by using offer codes. If no one is using an offer code, the company is going to assume that that sponsorship isn’t working out and might terminate the deal.
Not my problem,I’m never sitting through ads/shilling ever again
I have premium so they’re already getting my money.
Yeah, that’s fair.
I use ublock origin, sponsorblock, dearrow and I’m never turning them off
deleted by creator
Don’t hate the player, hate the game.
I agree, ads suck, but a lot of good content just wouldn’t exist otherwise, because their viewers don’t want to fund it. If you help fund it, then maybe they don’t need to have sponsorships.
deleted by creator
I guess you only know about the channels who cater to the lowest common denominator? That tracks.
Corridor Digital and LTT optionally let you use their own paid platforms to view everything without ads.
Channel 5 will sometimes run a sponsor, sometimes not based on patreon support.
I only watch Atrioc’s 10-15m marketing videos, but in the last year I’ve seen him run one sponsor.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Captain Disillusion or DIY Perks run a sponsor segment.
Kurzgesagt and Mark Rober only run ads for their own merch at this point.
Internet Shaquille and Girlfriend Reviews always put the ad at the end to make it as easy as possible to skip.
Zach Freedman makes great stuff and is thankful to his patreon subs, but is clear about why he still needs sponsorships to afford what he does. Same for Simone Giertz who is trying to get her own product company off the ground, but it’s not profitable.
Yeah, it’s unfortunate how dependent on ads everything is, but the reality is it gets funding, and there is a lot of actually useful, educational content that leverages that.