• Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is it any different than speaking in front of your smartphone?

      I don’t own an echo or Google whatever but I’ve definitely mentioned things and then got ads for that thing within the hour/day. Like cat litter when I don’t even own a cat, just mentioned it once for cleaning up spills.

      • Seudo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        More likely there’s a bunch of data points it can use. Coming within BT range of someone who does have a cat for example. Otherwise all the major smart phone companies would need to be in collision to keep the secret because the battery drain would be so blatant of it was recording, processing, transfering etc.

        • cor315@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          And all the articles that have said they aren’t recording everything, I guess they would have to be in on it too.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, don’t go looking too hard whenever you’re in a hospital or anything. The number of vulnerabilities I can spot with as little infosec knowledge I have is deeply concerning

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wait until you hear about the listening devices that 90% of people carry around in their pockets everywhere they go.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    IoT and smart device security only means your data is protected from unauthorized access. It’s up to the manufacturer, not the user to decide who can get in.

  • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’re all missing the real kicker here - this sign is only here for the HIPAA auditor. Everyone knows that no one is actually going to mute the thing.

  • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shit like this is why I got a dumb speaker. It just plays audio, it doesn’t have a battery (meaning that unplugged = zero power), it doesn’t have wifi, it doesn’t have an assistant, it just plays the music I ask it to play via Bluetooth.

  • Devouring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s fascinating how people know that these devices break their privacy, yet they keep using them.

      • SolarMech@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Professionals should care about their client’s privacy though. That shouldn’t be a debate.

      • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        People that don’t care about their privacy is exactly what makes it so hard to just exist privately. I shouldn’t have to give up my rights because other people don’t care about them