• XiaCobolt [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Pritzker is pretty much Bail Organa, super wealthy, giant liberal, opposes the fascist takeover but balks at the more radical elements aligned with him and if not killed in a super weapon demonstration would just be the superficially nicer regime that protects capital.

  • redchert@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Mind you even star wars liberal politicians like Mon Mothma and Bail Organa, literally covertly send ships (recorded as being stolen by “pirates”) and prisoners to the rebels, as well as massive financial support. Like not even the most radical elected official in america does that.

    • LisaTrevor [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      28 days ago

      I love the show for what it is, but that’s definitely part of its liberal fantasy, a way to project the desire for the ghouls from the party they support to secretly be on their side

      of course that baggage was already there from the prequels. Lucas might have been imagining the Viet Cong in the 70s but those late 90s/mid 2000s scripts were pretty firmly the ramblings of a rich dude a little too bought in to the idea that Cheyney just tricked everyone into invading Iraq and not that the structure of the political system itself meant that liberals genuinely saw it as being in their best interests

      it’s sort of a minor error for Andor though, people wanting to use quotes like this are at least directly contradicted by the actual events of the show. Mothma doesn’t do much more than blow hot air to a dwindling senate and that still gets her marked for assassination, and she doesn’t respond by coming back to apologize for hurting the fascists’ feelings

  • primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    28 days ago

    Well the left (of Ronald Reagan) does not exist and cannot be acknowledged except as a threat, so it must just be cosmic forces and its inevitable. Anyway, time to go do some more HUAC

  • SickSemper [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Not cringe, but I maintain my criticism of its “anti-authoritarian” politics, because if it were truly Marxist revolutionary agitprop, there wouldn’t be a ton of people internalizing “wow the empire is just like the Soviet Union/russia and Ukraine” without a second thought.

    • ufcwthrowaway [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      I mean, the parallels to the Irish struggle for independence and Jewish resistance to the holocaust could not be more explicit. I think Americans are just uneducated and bad at understanding media. This is why Authors like Steinbeck had to put in sections explaining that capitalism was bad. They knew they couldn’t trust people to understand even the simplest layer of symbolism.