While a Trump presidency couldn’t slam the brakes on the E.V. transition, it could throw enough sand in the gears to slow it down. And that might have significant consequences for the fight to stop global warming.

  • Joanie Parker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    I own a Volt. But let’s stop saying that EVs are going to stop global warming. Do they help after years of being on the road? Sure a little. But until China stops burning coal, Saudi Arabia quits drilling for oil, factory dairy farms shut down.

    People over paying for a car isn’t doing a damn thing.

    Are they fun to drive? Yes. Can you save a few bucks on gas? Yep sort of. (Thanks new registration taxes) But other than that EVs are not saving the world. That’s not even thinking about the mining required to make batteries, or the copper needed for the motors.

    We need to hold these super polluters accountable, and stop expecting the little guy to bail us out of the problems they created.

    • br3d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      And you don’t see any link between ditching your ICE car and “Saudi Arabia quits drilling for oil”? Better to ditch your ICE car for no car, of course, but if you HAVE to have one, the smallest EV you can get away with is a step towards stopping that oil drilling. If everyone did it, that drilling would change dramatically

        • br3d@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          More people driving EVs won’t make (oil-based) fuel cheaper. Every person getting off oil makes producing oil-based fuels more expensive, as the economies of scale are reduced.

          Go to extremes if that helps picture it: imagine you’re suddenly the only person on Earth driving an ICE car. How much would you be paying for a fill-up, which now involves finding, extracting, shipping and refining fuel just for you: more than today or less than today?

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Fuel prices halved during covid when everyone stayed home.

            All the infrastructure is in place, the fuel needs to be sold.

            Reduced demand will only reduce production of fuel from more expensive wells, like where the oil is more difficult to reach.

            • spacesatan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah but nobody retired a marginally profitable fuel refinery that became unprofitable during covid because they knew demand would return soon. The effect isn’t instantaneous, but all the infrastructure has operation and maintenance costs. With fewer overall consumers all the overhead has to go somewhere eventually.

              • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                eventually

                Yeah, but I think you might be waiting longer than you imagine.

                There might be a long tail of barely profitable wells with low output, but I suspect the vast majority of current production can sustain a significant reduction in retail price and still be more profitable than simply capping the well.

                Every person that switches to an EV increases the demand for electricity and reduces the demand for fuel.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s not even thinking about the mining required to make batteries, or the copper needed for the motors.

      Yeah, but… that stuff isn’t going away. In a couple decades when an EV’s worn out, all the materials will still be there ready for recycling. It’s not like coal and oil where we dig them up and then set them on fire and they’re gone.

    • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re totally right I just want to mention one of their benefit which is the markedly decreased emissions from a smog standpoint! Some cities really struggle with this problem.

      But from a climate change perspective you’re right.

    • fadhl3y@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Can EVs reduce local emissions, and lead to improved air quality? Is air quality something we should be concerned about?

    • Muffi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      EV’s are also just as devastating to collective infrastructure as CE cars. They also won’t change the fact that most packaging and plastic is still made from oil. They are a temporary patch, not a solution.