• kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    There will be an insane propaganda push where basically every piece of media supports the nuke and then it’s memory holed

    Like 9/11 and Iraq

  • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Judging from our track record. Most Americans would get over it and/or forget about it in 3 months maybe less. There would absolutely be protests, but nothing meaninful would come of them. The consensus would be “whats done is done and we should move on” or something along those lines. Maybe I am too cynical though

  • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Depends where.

    A city there will be some repercussions for US image and it will push more countries to try and slip away from the grasp of the US but also allow the US to terrorize a lot of countries successfully with threats by pointing to that. Anti-imperialist solidarity will rise but also probably the willingness of nations to capitulate to the US because they’re unhinged and faced no consequences will also rise as they make the calculation they can’t risk American nuking them.

    If they nuke Fordow I expect other than some protests and the usual anti-nuclear movement (aging now) being angry very little will come of it. Russia and China will condemn, NATO and media and most Americans will shrug and either see it as bad because we shouldn’t be bombing Iran (not because of being nuclear) or as good because we should or as neither because they couldn’t care less and are late for brunch.

    If they do nuke Fordow I think it would be interesting to see if Russia uses the opening from that to use a tactical nuke on a hardened Ukrainian military installation in a similar way and as a kind of response.

  • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I honestly don’t know. A majority of Americans don’t support a war with Iran, but that doesn’t matter. A supermajority might disapprove of the nuke, but that also wouldn’t matter. Obviously the public opinion will depend on the pretext, but the public opinion just never matters.

  • Assian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    In the US? I don’t think people would give a shit honestly. The libs might have a big protest, that’s it

    Edit: for like a tactical nuke on the buried facility or sth. Obviously if they nuked Tehran it would be something else entirely but I don’t see the need or the reason to do that.

    • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      tactical nuke

      Total meme category. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were “strategic” bombings using “tactical” yields according to post-war terminology.

    • mrfugu [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I think this is the distinction. I really don’t think any amount of propaganda would get the general gen z/millennial American public to have majority support for dropping a bomb on a major city center filled with civilians.

      If they drop it somewhere else in Iran and it only destroys the homeland and ruins the lives of thousands instead of millions, the mental gymnastics would be much more common. That said tho a modern tactical nuke usage against a “purely military” target would certainly open up public sentiment towards future usage.