• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “There’s no recording allowed in here.”

    The entire world should be a witness to the insanity of what’s going on. Record everything, even when they say it’s not allowed.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    21 hours ago

    In Poland the senators and congressmen have constitutional right to intervene in the administration. They can basically show up to any public office and say “I’m from the senate, what the fuck are you up to?”. They not always get access to the “backstage” but arresting them for it would be unimaginable. They also have immunity so detaining them would be illegal. How weak the US system is in comparison is mind boggling. Entire opposition could be put in jail tomorrow and nothing would be done about it.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    195
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,” Padilla said to Noem, which prompted several men to physically push him out of the room. It was unclear who the men were as several were dressed in plainclothes."

    Sounds like assault to me…

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    1 day ago

    He was detained!! They handcuffed him!

    What is this forcibly removed nonsense. They handcuffed a senator who wanted to know what DHS is doing in HIS state!

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., denounced the incident on the Senate floor. “I just saw something that sickened my stomach. The manhandling of a United States Senator, we need immediate answers to what the hell went on,” he said.

    Good to know old Chucky is still around. Haven’t heard a peep from him in a while.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You know the answer to what was happening Chuck. It’s an authoritarian regime. The question is, what are you going to do about it?!

      Nothing, because you’re trash. Fucking step down already.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Manhandling”?! That’s not man-handling, that’s assault. The Senator was assaulted. Chuck Schumer is such a spineless lick-spittle, even when it concerns the physical assault of those in his own Party.

    • valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Chuck doesn’t do anything useful. In fact he’s one of 47’s enablers. New York (greetings from) is having a tremendously hard time removing him, and bootlicker Gillibrand.

    • nthavoc@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Frumpy face, folded arms, glasses halfway down the nose, and talking like someone got their burger order wrong is the usual expected response.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a GOOD THING Democrats did NOT make the Law Political! OTHERWISE Republicans might Weaponize the law AGAINST Democrats!

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I do wonder if peoples minds have changed on stacking the courts and getting rid of the filibuster… I know a lot have changed their minds on the 2nd.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Haven’t the dems recently started some kind of initiative for an amendment to prevent court packing?

    • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Most Americans are too chicken shit to give up a few days of work. I mean, look at how these 9 to 5vers bitch and complain when people protest and it inconveniences them. They’ve swallowed the propaganda so hard that they applaud the police for arresting and abusing protestors. I have very little faith in my countrymen.

      • TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I support a general strike but I’m a doctor that works primarily in an underserved community filled with many immigrants (illegal and otherwise). I would support other people striking, but I feel like I couldn’t possibly stop working because my role is a lifeline for workers.

      • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Many people can’t miss a few days work without significant financial implications. Billionaires and corporations have us so underwater that we have no choice but to make a big stink where we can and voice our concern, with the occasional weekend march.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’ll dare note that in the beginning of the previous century financial implications of such a strike for a worker were not just that, and it involved also possibly serious physical damage (without easily available surgery and care) and detention.

          I would really like to find it in myself to do something like that, it takes a certain state of mind and a certain feeling in the air, because how do you start when nobody is yet doing it.

          • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d say part of the difference is that, at this point, the billionaires have left us with just enough to lose. I’m sure the risk of physical violence was still daunting, but when you have nothing left to lose then the prospect of physical harm somehow seems preferable to continuing with the status quo. That seems like an easy thing to say, but I’ve been there before.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Ah, yes, of course. That’s also the distinction of Russia’s situation from more classical kinds of fascism. Bad things happen, but the regime doesn’t put them under your nose. Intimidation happens, but there are no public executions Nazi-style. Propaganda happens, but it’s boring and one would think ineffective, except it still sticks, similar to advertising, - they’ve learned some lessons. Nazis were more interesting and imposing, but less efficient. This is state of the art.

              Same with today’s monopolies, oligopolies, rotten electoral systems, censorship.

              Everything has been optimized to the last cent. Not the good old days, when the bad guys were generous with impressions.

              Reminds me of Boussenard’s sentiment on new uniforms in his children’s book on the Boer war - no more nice glares and colors, just khaki everywhere - a symbol of efficiency, because camouflage now is treated seriously enough.

              Like Intel’s tick-tock. Worker movements and fascisms 100 years ago were the “tick”, and now is the “tock” - boring, depressing, deadly efficient.

      • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is why safety nets are important. In US you can lose your job, not get unemployment and lose access to doctor.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          And this is why the right has been systematically dismantling all safety nets for decades.

          This is the end game…

      • xyzzy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Are you serious? Most Americans are scared of losing their jobs and being unable to provide for their families, including caregivers for elderly parents. Many are only a few missed payments away from having their vehicles repossessed or being evicted and becoming homeless. Some have ongoing health conditions that require insurance.

        If you have nothing to lose or you have a safety net and can stop going to work, great, good job. Most people aren’t in your position.

        • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Many service members are in the same position and depend on Uncle Sam to pay their bills (and, ya know, to stay out of jail for derelicion of duty or insubordination)…hence why it might be a tad difficult to “remember their oath” and stand up against vaguely illegalish orders, which might morally preserve their soul, but crushes their ability to live. Only bringing this up because of comments in other posts related to the NG and USMC in LA, but I see a close parallel of maliciously manufactured helplessness to self-advocate.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s an intentionally designed system, so that everyone falling out of line by themselves would hurt only themselves. It’s the point of governments and militaries than everyone can be replaced.

            It was always so.

            Strikes are supposed to be “suicidal”.

            The problem is that western cultures after 60s manufactured expectation that there’s no such thing among necessary ones in life. That you live for feeling nice, comfort, good things, peaceful politics. That risking your life to make a statement won’t be required from you. That was initially counterpropaganda to communism, I think.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not that they’re chicken shit. They aren’t even against Trump’s policies.

        • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          That, too. Even a good portion of Dems support this stupid fucks actions and “policy.” And the word policy is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Huh. The But Muh Freezed Peach “free speech absolutists” on the right are saying what on this? I bet they are saying sweet fuckall.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Turns out they just need to be on the winning team. Their entire existence is so frail that the only way to cope is to hate a group of anyone.