A reminder folks: people engage in this kind of radical protest because it works:

Results of two online experiments conducted with diverse samples (N = 2,772), including a study of the animal rights movement and a preregistered study of the climate movement, show that the presence of a radical flank increases support for a moderate faction within the same movement. Further, it is the use of radical tactics, such as property destruction or violence, rather than a radical agenda, that drives this effect. Results indicate the effect owes to a contrast effect: Use of radical tactics by one flank led the more moderate faction to appear less radical, even though all characteristics of the moderate faction were held constant. This perception led participants to identify more with and, in turn, express greater support for the more moderate faction. These results suggest that activist groups that employ unpopular tactics can increase support for other groups within the same movement, pointing to a hidden way in which movement factions are complementary, despite pursuing divergent approaches to social change.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    So, the money that could have gone to an actual charity is now going to be spent on your legal defense?

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        5 days ago

        Neither is someone acting like a fool.

        The stunt was ridiculous. In the time he spent holding up planes, those jets had to keep burning fuel to keep the Ac going. He put more poison in the air.

        • solo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Sorry, but what are you talking about? Who is he? What jets?

          Maybe take a look at the article?

        • drkt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          And if they hadn’t done it, those jets would’ve landed on time and other jets would’ve taken off and absolutely nothing would have changed about the total net carbon gain. Protests work, they get people talking.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            5 days ago

            Not all protests are equal.

            All this one did was get people to hate the guy who slowed down the airport.

            • drkt
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              https://drkt.eu/files/protesting.webp

              Also they literally didn’t do it so maybe read the article

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                5 days ago

                Kind of proving my point here.

                One guy did nothing and still managed to get arrested. Makes the whole movement look silly.

                Completely the opposite of the situation in the cartoon; a well organized protest that actually reaches the leader.

                Thanks for helping me show how dumb the plan was.

                • drkt
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Okay I’ll bite. What is your solution?

                  Apathy didn’t work

                  Peaceful protesting didn’t work

                  Scientific inquiry didn’t work

                  Political petitioning didn’t work

                  How many must die to climate change before you’re personally willing to accept the idea of a harmless but disruptive protest?

                  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    bootlickers don’t want people to come up with other solutions, they just want to point out the ones they know will work are inconvenient. Also, their fee fees got hurt when people point out they’re bootlickers.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Actually invconveniencing people is secondary if you’re still able to get press coverage

                  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    You get the press coverage. It’s “Idiot Wastes People’s Time.”

                    If they bother to read the whole story, they think, “he wasted people’s time for that?”