miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agoFriendly Reminderlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1396arrow-down131
arrow-up1365arrow-down1imageFriendly Reminderlemmy.dbzer0.commiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·15 days agoWhy double down on being wrong? My two examples aren’t publishing bullshit. If OP was only talking about chatgpt and the like, maybe they should have said that instead of lumping all LLMs together?? Either way I think we’re done here, a shame you never actually argued with fervor
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·edit-215 days agoFine then: IBM - Not an LLM Meta Open Catalyst - Not an LLM In fact the Open Catalyst in the paper specifically compares it’s model to LLMs in that both different models improved with larger datasets (and increased processing power). Eat shit
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·15 days ago IBM DeepSearch. But you’re half right, the drug I was thinking of was BenevolentAI…using an LLM similar to IBM. CatBERTa But nice try. Eat shit, I guess
Why double down on being wrong? My two examples aren’t publishing bullshit.
If OP was only talking about chatgpt and the like, maybe they should have said that instead of lumping all LLMs together??
Either way I think we’re done here, a shame you never actually argued with fervor
Fine then:
IBM - Not an LLM
Meta Open Catalyst - Not an LLM
In fact the Open Catalyst in the paper specifically compares it’s model to LLMs in that both different models improved with larger datasets (and increased processing power).
Eat shit
IBM DeepSearch. But you’re half right, the drug I was thinking of was BenevolentAI…using an LLM similar to IBM.
CatBERTa
But nice try. Eat shit, I guess