The first actual sentence in the article clears that up.
Schools will be told not to teach children any form of sex education until year 5, when pupils are aged nine, according to reports, with some topics being delayed until pupils are 13.
Though that could have been the title and tagline…
The contents of the article must be consumed in order to discuss them intelligently, to create an informed opinion, and to pose questions that have positive worth within the conversation that ensues from its having been read and ruminated upon?
I understand downvoting me under the assumption I only read the title, but I did actually read the aforementioned sentence, but since it was contradictory to both the title and the tagline I was unsure
The first actual sentence in the article clears that up.
Though that could have been the title and tagline…
The contents of the article must be consumed in order to discuss them intelligently, to create an informed opinion, and to pose questions that have positive worth within the conversation that ensues from its having been read and ruminated upon?
Preposterous notion.
I understand downvoting me under the assumption I only read the title, but I did actually read the aforementioned sentence, but since it was contradictory to both the title and the tagline I was unsure