They will also delete any comments that complain about AI at all, even though there is no rule against it.

/–edit–/
After second look, that’s not entirely true, but they definitely have a trigger finger for it and leave plenty of other “off-topic” comments.

Considering the amount of posts deleted, it should have just been locked instead of nuking comments with a negative view of AI

Here’s the thread in the screenshot:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43426671/18476015

Also, here you can see other’s seem to think this was an attempt to silence dissent (though, I don’t think that this coming from drag is a great point for it):
https://lemmy.ca/post/43313594

/–/

Just look at this completely insane comment from an instance admin:

  • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yep, lmao. It was well written and made some points, then the advertisement came and all credibility disappeared.

      • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I didn’t say they were good or bad points, just points. Compared to other arguments I’ve seen, it was written better than most. Could have been AI generated, though.

        • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, there was an implication that they were good points, though I can see now that was unintentional.

          Consider how the phrase “you’ve got a point” is often used to describe a valid point worth considering. I would consider “a valid point worth considering” a worthy definition of “a good point.”