More important than opposition to the current system is the prefiguration of an anarchic one. So much online discourse is about attacking, a lot less is about building. I drew this to remind myself and others that confronting the state is only a part of the puzzle and building new systems without it is also important.

Licence (as always): CC-0, No rights reserved.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    K. The belief you can do that without community, and while centering self-interest, is classically childish anarchism.

    But the memes here are good usually.

    • snekmuffin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      you might be confusing anarchism, the exact polar opposite of “without community” with the hyper-individualist flavor of american libertarianism

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think you understand anarchism or what we mean when we say “without a state”. Hint: it’s the opposite from “without community, and while centering self-interest,”

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The way it worked for millennia in societies without a powerful state –
          by shunning the contract breakers in your community.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Are you for real? Do you think work will cease to exist? Monetary compensation isn’t the only thing that can be exchanged for work/art/etc.

            We already have all sorts of contracts that don’t involve money directly. Marriage is a contract, and that wouldn’t just cease to exist.

            People are selfish and greedy. There needs to be something to try to prevent and/or punish that. And literal force/violence is the only thing that can ever do it. Without it, there will always be people who abuse it.

            So what happens is the person with the biggest gun/stick/army/etc. wins the dispute. Every time.

            That’s how you end up with feudalism. How come libertarians always need to personally re-learn every mistake and lesson we’ve already learned the hard way? It is literally currently destroying the US government.

            Learn some history and we don’t have to repeat the same mistakes again and again.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I understand how you believe it’ll work. I think it’s naive and unrealistic. Especially as a first system post-capitalism.