At a secret workshop in Ukraine’s north-east, where about 20 people assemble hundreds of FPV (first person view) drones, there is a new design. Under the frame of the familiar quadcopter is a cylinder, the size of a forearm. Coiled up inside is fibre optic cable, 10km (6 miles) or even 20km long, to create a wired kamikaze drone.

Capt Yuriy Fedorenko, the commander of a specialist drone unit, the Achilles regiment, says fibre optic drones were an experimental response to battlefield jamming and rapidly took off late last year. With no radio connection, they cannot be jammed, are difficult to detect and able to fly in ways conventional FPV drones cannot.

“If pilots are experienced, they can fly these drones very low and between the trees in a forest or tree line. If you are flying with a regular drone, the trees block the signal unless you have a re-transmitter close,” he observes. Where tree lined supply roads were thought safer, fibre optic drones have been able to get through.

  • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, since we’ve got you:

    What would be the minimum reasonable distance to use a TOW (with accompanying operator control) vs something unguided (either the TOW or otherwise)?

    • tux7350@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ooo minimum? Dont recall that exactly but I do remember the mechanism that arms the missile is activated by G force. Missile has to fly for a bit before it arms.

      Second part of your question is pretty loaded. Theres tons of unguided systems that have wildly different arming mechanisms.

      Really what you care about is stand off distance. Can I hit my enemy with my missile before they can get into range to shoot me?