D•Scribe
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Jay🚩@lemmy.ml to NetBSD@lemmy.sdf.org · 7 months ago

Emulating architectures with qemu: which performs best?

blog.fluxcoil.net

external-link
message-square
0
link
fedilink
1
external-link

Emulating architectures with qemu: which performs best?

blog.fluxcoil.net

Jay🚩@lemmy.ml to NetBSD@lemmy.sdf.org · 7 months ago
message-square
0
link
fedilink
Virtualization? Emulation? What are these, after all?\nVirtualization in our context here means that when a guest operating system does computations, these get directly offloaded to the hypervisors cpus. One of the benefits is performance, one of the downsides is that the guests cpus need to exactly match the hypervisors cpus, or a subset. Emulation means that the computations are done in software. With this, host/guest architectures can be different. As a downside, this is slower than virtualization. Using emulation, we can for example start a x86 based system, and then emulate completely different architectures like ARM or sparc64. How much performance does that cost us, how much power does this consume?\n
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.

NetBSD@lemmy.sdf.org

netbsd@lemmy.sdf.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !netbsd@lemmy.sdf.org

Discussions on NetBSD

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 6 users / week
  • 19 users / month
  • 74 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 408 subscribers
  • 81 Posts
  • 7 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • SDF@lemmy.sdf.org
  • UI: unknown version
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org