• First Majestic Comet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Already said it in !main@lemmy.blahaj.zone but I’ll say it again so others can see it here.

    It seems drag was banned from the site for sharing people’s DMs, though I’m sure that’s not the whole story, drag has a history of being banned for way more than just the thing on the label. Looking at the comments on drag’s home instance where it hasn’t been removed, it seems drag was sharing those DMs in attempt to libel Ada for not taking the action drag wanted. That’s on top of the fact that she did not give drag permission to share them. It’s an asshole move for sure, and I have to say if I were in Ada’s shoes I’d do the same.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Drag didn’t know Ada didn’t message spujb. Drag was making it clear to spujb and anyone reading the thread that drag wasn’t lying. Drag is sorry to Ada and won’t do it again. Drag tried to tell her earlier today, but drag couldn’t

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        since the text is too small to be readable, nobody can tell; but in any case, privacy matters regardless of the classification. If drag cared they could’ve asked Ada beforehand if it would be okay.

        But I guess courtesy is a one-way to drag.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Drag is sorry to Ada for sharing the screenshot of her saying she’d talk to spujb. Drag won’t do it again.

    • SatyrSack@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How so? On Lemmy, at least, they are absolutely not private. It is just a way for two users to communicate without cluttering up a thread or something. Not a way to communicate in secret.

      EDIT: Oh, I missed the joke. DM = Dick Move. Woosh

      • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s private in the sense that the DMs were made between 2 people. They are public in the sense that the admins of the instance(s) can read the DMs. Just like admins of any server can read anything that’s not encrypted at source.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          so… only admins can read the mail but the counterparty can’t disclose their own mail?

          wtf sort of logic does this rely on

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No. Admins can read any mail. And everyone has access to their own mail?! And I mean everyone can disclose anything in their posession. It’s just not allowed and unethical. Though in most cases you’re allowed to publish what you wrote yourself. You just may not publish other people’s secrets or info publicly.

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Almost everything you said isn’t true. Point to the rule that says someone can’t disclose a DM they were part of? Unethical? Sure.

              And I mean everyone can disclose anything in their posession.

              It’s just not allowed

              Make up your mind.

              Also Drag is a troll. Has suggested that several people commit suicide. Drag doesn’t get a pass. Drag is a piece of shit. Don’t be Drag.

              • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Not sure where you live, and I don’t know much about US law, but for me, it’s §203 and §206 StGB. Get’s you either fined, or up to a maximum of 1 or 5 years in jail. And especially §206 is super clear and specifically mentions electronic letters. I can assure you, I’m 100% correct on that.

                • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It depends on the state. My state is a one party state, meaning any person that is party to a private conversation can legally reveal everything in it to the public.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s an instance ban. Instance bans automatically issue community bans for local communities the user has been active in.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ada, drag is sorry for sharing the screenshots. Drag didn’t think they were anything serious. Drag won’t share any screenshots without permission again.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can’t remember the exact details but I believe at least a few people were banned for suggesting that drag was a troll and refusing to use their preferred neopronouns.

        • megopie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          People weren’t banned for criticizing them, they were banned for encouraging others to misgender people if they don’t like them. I don’t think anyone was banned for not using “personal” neo pronouns.

          And drag was banned from BZ for telling people to KYS, then they went and made a new account on a different instance and have continued pissing people off, now the new acount is being banned from stuff because they’ve continued the kind of behavior that got them banned in the first place.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            they were banned for encouraging others to misgender people if they don’t like them

            (My God what the fuck am I thinking wading into this.)

            “Dragon” isn’t a gender. Refusing to identify someone as the gender they identified with, because you thought they were trolling, is fucked up yes. That’s why blahaj made the rule, and it’s a good rule. Refusing to identify someone as a dragon because you think they’re trolling is A-ok. Deliberately conflating those two issues, so that you pretend someone is “misgendering” if they exercise a small amount of common sense and refuse to go along with someone being a dragon, is I think exactly the trick this particular troll was trying to play, and it worked like fireworks. I think in terms of creating conflict between two reasonable points of view on this topic that would get people on both sides all amped up about it, they succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.

            • belastend@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Its not even “Dragon”. Its “Dragon Fucker”.

              I made an error. It’s short for “Dragon Rider”.

              • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Drag’s gender isn’t dragon fucker. That’s drag’s sexuality. Drag’s gender is dragon rider. One is about who drag is, one is about who drag likes to fuck.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Careful not to mythologize the characters of people who have just hurt others.

    With 100+ comments already this is probably a message delivered too late, but if you are reading this be aware that comments here that digress away from simply keeping history into ogling and ridiculing serve only to feed the needs of a user who already has alt accounts drifting in as we speak.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m really amazed how they don’t try very hard to conceal their alts as alts. Change what they refer to themselves as in the third person, and everything else is exactly the same. Low effort.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Drag can’t control how drag’s friends talk. If drag were writing their posts for them, drag would be a lot more careful. Unfortunately, drag doesn’t use disguised alts, and drag’s friends write their own comments themselves. And drag is friends with other queer neurodivergent people who have personalities and values similar to drag’s.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            If you want to get to know someone, the best way is to treat them like a person. And drag would think getting to know somebody is the best way to find out who they are; drag, or someone else. Drag doesn’t think anybody has actually tried to find the truth.

            Lemmy is supicious that drag’s friends don’t use Lemmy very often, and mostly just comment whenever drag is upset. Would you want to use Lemmy if your main experience with it was your friend crying because someone misgendered them? When you think of drag’s friends as people, their actions make a lot more sense.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If they follow the rules, they are always welcome in Casual Conversation.

    I do not understand the same reasons to judge them that everyone else seems to. They have never seemed antagonistic.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Its been a while since I saw the posts, but it was not subtle at all; immediate reactionary posts from the same instance all badmouthing someone drag was arguing with, using the same phrasing and sentence structure drag uses.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            These immediate reactionary posts, were they directed at various different people? Drag has been in drama and conflict with a lot of people on Lemmy. So if drag made the posts, it would make sense for them to be directed at all the people drag has had a lot of conflict with: spujb, Flying Squid, Pug Jesus…

            Or, was the alt-account harassment all directed at a single user, and all at a time when that user had something to gain from playing the victim? Because if that’s the case, it seems like maybe that particular user is somehow linked to the cause of the harassment.

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      According to “drag,” you’ve already misgendered them four times. They’d report you for this.