Is this third positioning?

  • Kaffe@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    No, and they aren’t even “anti-Auth”, the US isn’t on their chart, Britian ain’t there either. They are basically middle class moralists and join their colonial governments in terrorizing the infrastructure of states oppressed by Imperialism. They are little digital missionary rats.

    • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gotcha, thanks. Do you know of any good sources on it I could look at for the details? Like operations they’ve taken credit for, for example. The only concrete example I can remember was something about Egypt from years back and at the (lib brain) time I thought it was cool, but given what I know now about imperialism and how it operates with claiming tyrannical any country that opposes it in any way, they were probably on the side of imperialism there.

      • Kaffe@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Besides their “War on Russia” and multiple times hacking the PRC, a big example would be them attacking Syria for claims that the government took out communication infra during a “crackdown”. It turns out, it was the US NSA that took down Syria’s telecoms during an ISIS invasion so Anonymous went out of their way to prevent any messaging between the government fighting ISIS and the civilian population.