JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 年前Fitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square142linkfedilinkarrow-up11.4Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.38Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 年前message-square142linkfedilink
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 年前honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-squareshea@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down11·2 年前it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-squareFarvana@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 年前It’s a chunk of plastic on your wrist. It’s always going to be a bit tacky.
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 年前True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
It’s a chunk of plastic on your wrist. It’s always going to be a bit tacky.
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.