Wi-Fi 7 to get the final seal of approval early next year, new standard is up to 4.8 times faster than Wi-Fi 6::There are a lot of ‘draft’ Wi-Fi 7 devices around, but ‘Wi-Fi 7 Certified’ devices will only come to market sometime next year.

  • .:\dGh/:.@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Always wondered about penetration and signal length. Does beat 2.4Ghz, still?

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If the cause of the poor 2.4ghz range was tons of interference on that band, then maybe. But lower frequencies simply go farther, so 6ghz will always have a lot shorter range than 2.4ghz. Though while it’s impossible to change the laws of physics, it might be possible to change the laws around wireless telecommunication to allow it to transmit at a much higher power - not sure if WiFi 7 does.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I am just glad that 6E and 7 have access to 6GHz so that once my devices support it i can disable both 2.4 and 5GHz to lower interference from neighboring networks. The higher it goes in frequency the less interference everyone will get.

    • waitmarks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      You wont want to disable 2.4 and 5GHz on wifi 7. The reason it gets so much higher speeds than 6e is that it can send data on all 3 spectrum simultaneously. If you turn off 2.4 and 5GHz you would essentially be limiting yourself to 1/2 speed.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Less RF interference, sure, but a lot more wall and physical object interference as the higher frequencies aren’t able to go through them nearly as well.

      Overall, it’s great to have more spectrum available, especially in a less crowded range. More options means more optimal solutions to be had.

      • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Thats true. And the higher it goes the more money you have to spend to properly network. I have heard 60GHz requires you to be in the same room as the AP but gives fantastic speeds. What i eventually plan on doing is buying say a 24 port PoE switch and running 2 cables to the ceiling in each room (for redundancy) and putting an AP in every room. I know that will cost a good chunk of money, but with an AP in every room that would future proof the network for higher and higher frequencies in the future.

        • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you’re wanting to future proof, run conduit not just wires. For now a setup like that is overkill and probably straight up won’t work well, since roaming is a client decision and the clients make really silly choices sometimes.