Website : https://www.yes-peace.org/en
From https://x.com/WiphalaF/status/1902285589149323408, quoting a french parliament’s member, “obviously” accused of antisemitism since all jews are apparently genocidal and criticizing Netanyahu’s greed for more territories is the same as hating the jewish religion, etc.
Unbelievable that jewish celebrities are supporting the instrumentalization of an antisemitism that they’re supposedly really fearing(, e.g., among many, many, many more examples).
FAFO is an “argument” that could obviously be used to justify October 7th.
What would anyone do faced with a rampant israeli colonization that nothing can stop, not even u.n. decisions or neighbour’s violent threats ? They could be given an equivalent territory than the Sacred Lands ; or should unite instead with Israel, sharing peacefully the same territory, eventually with two governments and civil laws ?
Our mainstream medias are very biased, but surprisingly not as unilateral/biased as expected/usual, though.
This is an expression of idealism. I have a desire to own a house, it doesn’t mean that I will steal it from my neighbor at gunpoint. The desire (an idea) is the manifestation of material conditions, and the conditions are that zionists are in a position to settle land. How do you remove the idea of having a state for zionists while they are able to enforce that state?
The genocide we see now is a direct expression of this material basis. Settler-colonialism has to push someone out to settle on their land.
So surely the first step is dismantling the state of “Israel” and after that work will happen on Judaism; some of it probably organically.
But the way you say that we are “free” to consider that desire illegitimate quite clearly means that you don’t consider it illegitimate, and you are thereby defending the genocide that is going on as we speak. You may not think you are, but you are giving arguments to zionists for continuing the genocide. That’s exactly what they say - “we just want a state”