Summary

The White House now claims Elon Musk is not leading DOGE, despite Trump previously stating Musk was in charge of the task force cutting $2 trillion in federal spending.

A court filing says Musk is only a senior adviser without formal decision-making authority. However, Musk’s tweets and Trump’s remarks suggest he has been directing DOGE’s activities.

The revelation raises legal concerns, as lawsuits argue DOGE violates the Appointments Clause by bypassing Senate confirmation.

A federal judge is set to rule on an emergency motion against Musk’s involvement.

  • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You are doublethinking that DOGE is run by Musk. This will be rectified by Minitrue.

    This thoughtcrime is doubleplusungood. Thotpol will be notified, the guilty will visit a joycamp, and then the guilty will be unpersoned.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reminder: this guy could be impeached and out of office in under 24 hours, but every single Republican is actively choosing to be a Nazi instead.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      He was impeached multiple times the last time he was in office, why would doing it again magically dethrown him?

      Let’s be honest we all know what needs to be done to remove them from power.

      • almost1337@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 days ago

        Impeachment is what the House does, and it is basically a formal accusation. It then goes to the Senate for conviction, which if successful results in removal.

        Given that the Rs in both chambers are complicit in Trump’s actions, neither of his impeachments resulted in a conviction, and he is equally unlikely to be impeached under the current Congress.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Impeachment is only the first step, Orange Hamburglar has already been impeached multiple times, but the DoJ has never levied actual charges against him, so the act of impeachment itself is just a badge of dishonor until the government chooses to enforce its own laws. Asinine setup from beginning to end to protect criminals in power.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s what this ghouls want, it’s their wholr purpose and their whole deal. If you don’t have political institutions to protect you, they can eat you whole. And the best way to destroy political institutions is to errode public support for them.

      • ehpolitical@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, I’ve never had faith in politics… this whole mess just convinces me I’ve been right not to.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          This mess is here in big part because you and your fellow children never had faith in politics, and people who do have this faith decided for you.
          You had a chance to prevent it, multiple chances if you’re slightly older, but you threw it away, multiple times.

          • ehpolitical@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I believe we’re in this mess because you did choose to have faith in politics… in fallible, corruptible people.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 minutes ago

              And the alternative was what, to firebomb a wallmart? How many wallmarts you firebombed, how is the glorious revolution going?

  • Nikelui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I’m not the head of the department, it’s just an empty shell company with a puppethead that follows my every whim.”

      • Nikelui@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wonder if it’s possible to play to their egos and sow discord by continuing to call them President Musk and Mr. Trump.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Every reporter who asks trump a question should follow it up with “and what does Elon musk think about that?”

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            “Did Elon already approve this, or are you still waiting for him to decide?”

            Gotta push Donnie’s buttons harder.

        • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pretty sure Stephen King just got booted from Twitter for calling trump the first lady. That’s what a coworker told me, anyways.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            You might think so but I’m not convinced. They’re both clearly not well adjusted individuals. If anything I think the pettiness gets to them more than your average person.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is unironically functionally the same as how ‘Sovereign Citizens’ attempt to escape legal liability.

      You see, you’re suing a legal entity that isn’t me.

      But also, I can act with, as, and through my legal entity.

      But also also, I’m not actually responsible for anything bad I do, because my legal entity did that, not me.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        The sad state of our laws are such that they could set up a S-Corp or C-Corp and act in official capacity of that corporation literally get away with murder.

        • irreticent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          For those unaware of the term “alternative facts” here is a heads up:

          Alternative facts” was a phrase used by U.S. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway during a Meet the Press interview on January 22, 2017, in which she defended White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s false statement about the attendance numbers at Donald Trump’s first inauguration as President of the United States. When pressed during the interview with Chuck Todd to explain why Spicer would “utter a provable falsehood”, Conway stated that Spicer was giving “alternative facts”. Todd responded, “Look, alternative facts are not facts. They’re falsehoods.”

          • Edited to add hyperlink
      • irreticent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sometimes I worry about that strategy. He spouts so many lies it’s hard to wade through the bullshit and see what he actually plans to do.

        It normalizes his rhetoric in a way that makes people say, “That’s just Trump talking shit.” When we don’t take him seriously we put ourselves at a disadvantage.

        Also, look at his accusations about almost anything. Such projection. It seems like every time he chastises someone it’s for something he regularly does (or will do soon).

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      “It will become, potentially, the Manhattan Project of our time”

      In that hundreds of thousands will die and millions more will have their lives shortened and worsened as a result.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    A federal judge is set to rule on an emergency motion against Musk’s involvement.

    Best we will get is a superficial ruling that says he can’t do it while he continues to do it and there will be absolutely zero consequences nor will all of the people who he fucked receive any form of justice.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depends on how far Judge Tanya Chutkan is willing to go see her order(s) enforced. She famously has no love for Trump and his law breaking. Even so any ruling negative to Trump will probably get appealed to the Supremely Corrupt Court and get overturned.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well the key here would be to get a state to press the charges based on her ruling and then put out a warrant for Musks arrest, that way Trump can’t pardon the arrest nor can Musk freely travel the country as extradition laws would take hold.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    The ultimate game. Get into a position of power, work for free, your work is to guarantee you come out richer. Hire employees for “your” agency that is just a rebranded agency that already exists so no paperwork need be filed. Then, sound like a person of authority while “advising” said agency. Command those gullible 18-21-year-old kids to do unspeakable acts they’re too young and immature to comprehend.

    Kids end up being charged with the actionable crime, free “advisor” dude parachutes out the window to collect his solidified tax breaks.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, no, no, no. We’re too old for this. If any action is to happen it needs to be done to Elon. We’re not stupid. We know where these orders descend from.

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh sure, let us actually have choice in action. I’m speaking about how the Old Laws worked in the Long Long Ago. Now that there is no law, the hilarious part is that these old codgers that made this world domination plan forgot that law doesn’t matter when it comes down to it. Program a Tesla to explode while driving, why not? Random snipers on the way to work? Why not? McDonalds burger full of cyanide, why not? I’m not suggesting any evil action here, I just find it supremely funny that these idiots made a football play on America and the one thing they missed, which is the one thing the Republinazis always miss, is that rules are for all. When rules for thee vs me tease out, shit goes south real fast. They think the very laws they are dismantling will somehow let them be safe at the same time.

        The supreme hypocrisy of the under-educated is what it boils down to. America’s Golden Shower Age.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fun fact theres some evidence that the reason that Soissons was able to last so long while most of the other Roman holdouts collapsed is because they were able to avoid overt levels of favoritism under the law. Mind you this is Roman frontier law so it just meant folks got crucified equally.

      • irreticent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Perhaps in a more rational timeline. We’re fucked.

        I hate to be so pessimistic but I’m feeling overwhelmed lately.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    I suspect one of two things are happening, or maybe a mix of both:

    1. Trump doesn’t like the insinutations that he himself isn’t in control.

    2. Musk’s public image issues are now affecting the bottom lines of his companies.

    These things are direct results of both men being complete imbeciles. Nothing more to see here.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago
      1. They are purposefully sowing more confusion. All the chaos being a smokescreen to hide the obvious fact that they have both hands in the public coffers and are grabbing what they can.
    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s Schrödinger’s control: for the purpose of having executive authority over the project 2025 policy agenda he is in control, except when doing so is illegal in which case he isn’t. The status depends on who’s looking, as it is always exactly the status that evades accountability.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They aren’t imbeciles. They are pursuing their objectives in ways that are inconsistent with US Law and tradition and when they run into trouble they obfuscate as much as possible to forestall the consequences.

      As an example read the court filing from Joshua Fisher (pdf warning). If you read 3 & 4 carefully you’ll come to the understanding that Musk is a SGE of the WHO with the Job Title “Senior Advisor”.

      Then you run into #6 where the text turns itself inside out trying to explain that the US DOGE Service Temporary Organization is under the umbrella of the US DOGE Service which is separate from the White House Office (that employs Musk) but the US DOGE Service is still a component of the Executive…which Musk works for.

      Once you are done bending your noggin’ around all of that you are probably too tired and confused to ask the most important question. If Musk isn’t in charge of DOGE then who is?

      We all know it’s Musk but they can’t say that nor can answer the question with someone else’s name because then the jig would be up and they’d be hosed. They need it to be Musk for popularity reasons but they also need it to not be anyone at all so that no one can be held responsible.

      They know what they’re doing. Don’t assume for a single second that they don’t. You aren’t seeing stupidity, at least not on this, you are seeing methodical, planned, and deliberate attempts to confuse the issue in order to escape consequences and oversight.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Musk leads DOGE”

    “…that’s illegal.”

    “No, no, no musk doesn’t lead DOGE, he advises. Someone else leads it.”

    “…so you bypassed the Senate, also illegal…”

    “No, no, you don’t get it. Jesus takes the wheel here. It’s God that runs it! You don’t hate God do you!?”

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    If he isn’t running DOGE then why the fuck is he in the white house with his booger eater all the damn time? And why did he get access to those documents? And why is anyone listening to anything that falls out of his incel mouth?

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like the answer that grue@lemmy.world gave.

      It’s Schrödinger’s control: for the purpose of having executive authority over the project 2025 policy agenda he is in control, except when doing so is illegal in which case he isn’t. The status depends on who’s looking, as it is always exactly the status that evades accountability.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tell all of your wealthy friends that Musk/Trump has all of their social security, address, work history, salaray history, etc. in their hands, right now.

    • MostRegularPeople@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      The current argument is “you give your SSN, address, salary etc to the bank, your employer, the DMV, etc. They all want something from you. The world’s richest man doesn’t need your money, so why are you afraid of giving him all your information?”

      It’s basically “if you’ve done nothing wrong you’ve got nothing to hide” but with your identity and life savings and social security.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Billionaires don’t become billionaires by being good people, but they would respond to that idea with some horse crap about the American Dream™

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Billionaires don’t become billionaires by being good people

          And some millionaires. Musk and trump now have all the info on them to blackmail with. He’s a mob boss in real estate and casinos, of course he’s going to blackmail them.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The boomers on Facebook are acknowledging this and giving excuses already.

      “He’s rich so he doesn’t need to steal your money.”

      “He needs this to audit the IRS. He doesn’t care about your information”

      “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.”

      “All your information is already out there from other government leaks so this doesn’t make any difference”