• azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    The important piece of this to me is this: She made $1 mil on OnlyFans and $42k/year as a teacher. She wants to be a teacher despite making plenty of money from other sources. This tells me that unless you have other evidence of impropriety she’s someone we want in the classroom. It also reinforces my stance, along with plenty of other studies that have been performed, that a universal basic income won’t stop people from working.

    Pay people better and we’ll just keep working because we like it. It’s part of being human, but we shouldn’t be suffering to survive at the same time.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I quit a job I really liked for one I didn’t like nearly as much because I hardly made more than minimum wage

      If I won the lottery I would go back to that first job and work for free.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can’t retire on $1m net worth. That’s not even a house in lots of areas.

      It definitely helps. But giving up my career for $1m would be a very bad investment.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          yea but you can teach all life long, whereas on Onlyfans you… uh,… nevermind

          y’all misunderstood my post, I think. I was trying to joke about the fact that even if you’re getting on in years, there will always be an audience for your OnlyFans. Anywayyyy

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Add in that id you don’t blow it all, you get to count the interest income. A long term investment gets about 6-7% per year. That’s actually more than the teaching job pay.

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I love how the employer admitted to not checking her references or googling her beforehand.

    Can’t really blame her when they didn’t do their due diligence.

    • Spraynard Kruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, the ones who hired a teacher without doing any sort of a background check are the ones who really should be fired. Imagine if they hired someone who was actually dangerous to their students.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The attractive teachers must have really been frustrated by me. I only cared if you were a cool teacher. Most of the time, the attractive teachers were not the cool teachers.

    • lorkano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For sure it’s different when kids would just find out and start downloading her naked photos. Then parents would find out and be insanely mad that kids are viewing their teacher’s naked photos. It’s different case than secretly fantasizing about your pretty teacher lol

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I know how the parents feel. That’s stupid article didn’t include a link. Journalistic malpractice is what it is

  • TangoUndertow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It feels like she knew she would get fired from this new job, leverage it nationwide articles and get even more subscribers to her OF page. She even references the teaching gig in her bio, and the new job in her latest posts.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Maybe. It doesn’t matter. Jobs shouldn’t be able to fire you because you get naked on the Internet, which requires you to pay to even see in the first place.

      Edit:

      @meep_launcher@lemm.ee made a great point about teacher/student dynamics and I can agree with that in most circumstances (e.g. the students are underage). I still think it’s ridiculous for her second, non-teaching job to fire her.

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m a teacher and they specifically have guidelines on what you’re behavior online should be. Keeping your socials clean. Making sure my interactions with students are kept professional.

        The fact is that kids these days are nosey and great researchers. Having an only fans as an educator has a huge risk of students discovering it, and will ultimately change the relationship between student and teacher from a student/ teacher relationship to a viewer/ pornstar one.

          • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            This thread seems to fall into the “people who have no idea about the realities of teaching being confidently incorrect”.

            As someone somewhere said; if you want to lose faith in comment sections, go to a discussion on a topic that you are an expert on.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    OnlyFans and high school teacher absolutely do not mix. There is a 0% chance one will be able to properly educate students in that environment.

    • FloMo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If only we paid them a living wage so they wouldn’t have to seek additional income to survive.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If only we paid them a living wage


        ST. LOUIS…Her yearly teaching salary was $42,000

        In 2016, the median household income in the City of St. Louis was $42,000. source (expand the dropdown: What does this indicator measure’)

        She made as much teaching as the median household income in the area by herself (completely ignoring the rest of her household). Since when is that not a living wage?

  • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If there was karma on this place then I’m about to yeet it into oblivion but nevertheless. Teachers are not paid nearly enough but doing only fans and teaching to not combine at all. I won’t bother explaining why because it’s obvious.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      doing only fans and teaching to not combine at all

      Then we’ll see fewer and fewer teachers. And more and more sex workers.