• FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just add 2 things:

    1. Cookie settings are possible to set in the browser for all pages.
    2. There’s a reject all button on every cookie banner.
    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. There’s a reject all button on every cookie banner.

      Most importantly, those banners should be streamiled to look the same at the very least. No highlighing “ACCEPT ALL” while graying out “reject all” nonsense. No swapping the buttons left and right, top to bottom trickery. I’d prefer if the browser takes care of it all, though. I’m already using a plugin for that, though it comes with draw backs.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am using „I still don‘t care about cookies“ for Firefox. It basically auto-selects the least required cookies possible. Though some sites don‘t offer opt-out so it will automatically accept those cookies. Not perfect, but I really can‘t be bothered to do a cookie captcha every time I open a private tab for example.

    • iain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, just ban the collection of user data and selling to 3rd parties. Enormous fines for anyone still doing it. Destroy this entire industry please.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The EU is primarily pro-business, but that also means being against anti-competitive and underhanded business practices

        The browser thing sounds like a good solution (although there must be a reason why DNT headers weren’t made legally binding, potentially as they wanted to allow people to pick and choose what cookies they allow based on what they thought was “too far” or something but that’s conjecture), however disallowing all user data will likely lead to companies not being able to advertise to people who are interested in their products, something which the EU will see as a negative and would also cause an uptick in scams and misinformation as you see in low quality advertising space at the moment

        • iain@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This comment got to me really late, probably to Lemmy’s distributed nature.

          But I still want to add: of course business will make more money if you allow more practices, but selling personal data just has too many negative consequences.

          Also low quality advertising? You mean like billboards and in the newspaper? You mean regular advertising?

          • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean “[local town] grandma discovers 10 foods you never knew you should avoid” or even downright scams when I say low quality advertising

            Also “negative consequences” is a bit overdramatic and I’d love you to elaborate… Really it’s down to the person’s own opinion, eg you don’t like it so you’ll reject that sort of thing, meanwhile I don’t mind it especially as a way of paying for decent quality media so I’ll allow it on some sites but not others

    • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. No there most definitely is not. Most banners have a big yes button, and you need to scroll to a settings button and then do five more things to not get cookies.
      • PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        So true. And then you have Schibsted, Norways biggest media conglomerate; the only way to reject cookies is that you have to log in in order to reject it! According to the cookie law (no idea what it’s called), it’s illegal. It’s been reported to the EU and Norwegian government numerous times, but nothing happens. Fuck Schibsted!!

        • Robaque@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In my experience a lot of italian (particularly “news”) websites basically say “accept cookies or sign up for our paid subscription”

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But even if you reject all, you still allow them to track you through the legitimate interest cookies

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The reject all is already a thing. (Well is not all all, but reject all except necessary but those doesn’t matter much, they are not tracking).

      That said usually is not called this way as obvious, sometimes is just “reject” without the all, “accept only necessary”, “decline”, etc or you have to close the banner etc or they use some other confusing pattern.