pmjv@lemmy.sdf.orgM to unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · edit-27 months ago lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1364arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1360arrow-down1image lemmy.sdf.orgpmjv@lemmy.sdf.orgM to unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish · edit-27 months agomessage-square26linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresbv@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·7 months agoThat’s some fine error correction.
minus-squareEndymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 months agoNope, it reads as L-level correction, so up to 7%.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoCorrect. The author used the long numeric section to encode the data, see my incomplete analysis in another comment.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoActually I think the QR code contains no errors, it’s all in the weird numeric data. There are still things I don’t understand but see my other comment for analysis.
That’s some fine error correction.
Up to 30%.
Nope, it reads as L-level correction, so up to 7%.
Correct. The author used the long numeric section to encode the data, see my incomplete analysis in another comment.
Actually I think the QR code contains no errors, it’s all in the weird numeric data. There are still things I don’t understand but see my other comment for analysis.