I learned it from this More Perfect Union video titled: What the Maker of Ozempic Doesn’t Want You to Know: It’s Bankrupting America
The government grants the patent right, it’s not bound by it.
Like in England the king doesn’t need a license to give himself permission to drive.
He also doesn’t have a passport, because they are issued in his name.
Well of course. Didn’t you hear what the former head of the USPTO said?
That’s half the plot of Armageddon (1998)
Holy fuck that was a long time ago. :(
What are you talking about? That was only like ten years ago…
Well duh. They’re the enforcers. The enforcers don’t need to follow the rules.
The article only mentions patents, not copyrights.
I wanna say there is a hierarchy of enforcability to trademarks, copyrights and patents on top of their application requisites. I also think that Patents are sort of the top tier that all regulations apply to with a trickle down effect in how they apply to TM’s and C’s. Don’t quote me on it tho. I’m going off the time at work years ago when the idea of patenting or tradmarking a thing. I might also be mixing it up with how they regulate Trademarks vs Registered Copyrights.
It’s not a hierarchy of enforcability but they grant different protections for different lengths of time.
So trademark is you can’t call your soda Coke forever if they maintain trademark. But you can make a different identical tasting soda with a different name.
Copyright means you can’t make a copy of Harry Potter until the copyright ends 70 years after the author dies. You can however make your own story about a boy who goes to wizard school and fights a previously defeated evil.
Patent gives you the most protection because they protect the idea but only last up to 20 years depending on the type. So the RISC patent meant you couldn’t make a computer with fewer instructions allowing it to go faster until it expired.
If we just extend that rule to everyone we’d have better cheaper stuff and fewer rich people to boot.
