• BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 个月前

    The examples I gave have been from her campaign this year, I’m glad she’s voted progressively compared to most US Democrats, but she is campaigning as a moderate.

    As for her age, yeah, I’m glad we don’t have someone who’s an octogenarian running, but she’s closer to Biden’s age than she is AOC’s, an actual progressive Democrat.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      Worth noting that AOC is the youngest a president can be. Harris is 3 years younger than Obama.

      Age also does not determine if someone is progressive, liberal, or conservative.

      • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 个月前

        I don’t get this. Y’all on Lemmy are constantly screaming about, “When someone shows you who they are, believe them,” about people like Trump and the GOP, but you won’t acknowledge the same about Democrats.

        You’re right, Bernie is older than Biden, and some of the Squad are in their 40s/50s. I never said otherwise. And AOC is the youngest a president can be.

        Bernie ran on a progressive platform, Biden did not, and Harris is not, by her own admission. The Squad have progressive ideas they push and campaign on, Harris and Walz have not shown support for these same policies. She’s showing all of us that is not a progressive candidate, which is all this discussion is about.

        She’s the far better candidate compared to Der Orange, no one should be voting for Trump. This isn’t a “y’AlL nEeD tO vOtE tHiRd PaRtY” comment, or one telling anyone to stay home, or any of that.

        Harris is just not a progressive candidate, and a 60 year old woman who’s lived her entire life in the upper middle class has much less in common with the average person than someone like AOC.

        That’s what this whole comment chain was about: someone asked why Harris may have pressure behind the scenes to oust Kahn as FTC chair, and that would be the only reason I could think she’d do it: her wealthy donors want a less progressive FTC chair so they’ll stop going after the oligarchs, and Harris’s campaign seems to be very “return to the status quo” like the Democrats always seem to be doing.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 个月前

          YOU need to acknowledge that how someone campaigns is less reflective of their position than HOW THEY VOTE.

          • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 个月前

            I have, and even told you I hope she continues to follow her progressive voting record and prove me wrong.

            But based on her campaign, I don’t understand why you’re all acting like she’s a hugely progressive candidate. She’s just not, I’m sorry, but she’s not.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 个月前

      By 4 years. Harris is pretty in between AOC and Biden age wise. There are members of the squad who are in their late 40s/early 50s. And Bernie is older than Biden.

      • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        I don’t get this. Y’all on Lemmy are constantly screaming about, “When someone shows you who they are, believe them,” about people like Trump and the GOP, but you won’t acknowledge the same about Democrats.

        You’re right, Bernie is older than Biden, and some of the Squad are in their 40s/50s. I never said otherwise. And AOC is the youngest a president can be.

        Bernie ran on a progressive platform, Biden did not, and Harris is not, by her own admission. The Squad have progressive ideas they push and campaign on, Harris and Walz have not shown support for these same policies. She’s showing all of us that is not a progressive candidate, which is all this discussion is about.

        She’s the far better candidate compared to Der Orange, no one should be voting for Trump. This isn’t a “y’AlL nEeD tO vOtE tHiRd PaRtY” comment, or one telling anyone to stay home, or any of that.

        Harris is just not a progressive candidate, and a 60 year old woman who’s lived her entire life in the upper middle class has much less in common with the average person than someone like AOC.

        That’s what this whole comment chain was about: someone asked why Harris may have pressure behind the scenes to oust Kahn as FTC chair, and that would be the only reason I could think she’d do it: her wealthy donors want a less progressive FTC chair so they’ll stop going after the oligarchs, and Harris’s campaign seems to be very “return to the status quo” like the Democrats always seem to be doing.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          But her age has very little to do with that. Her being closer in age to Biden than AOC is totally irrelevant.

          • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 个月前

            I didn’t come back to Lemmy for five hours, and you and the other person both basically said the same thing. So you both got a combined answer of your comments.

            Glad you’ve resorted to insults when all I’ve done is give you what Harris is showing us and saying to us. But yep, someone challenged your position, and instead of acknowledging that it may not be as steady as you initially thought, you accuse them of being a bot, and then insult them.