• nomous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

    Unless you have weird double standards and only apply them when it’s convenient.

    • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      That doesn’t work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

    • Cleggory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

      It’s called mental gymnastics to think “two wrongs make a right.”

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          an argument that was never made

          It says 0 scandals right there in the post

          Just because the other guy also has scandals doesn’t mean she has 0

        • Cleggory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

          If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

          If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

            If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

            Hope this clarified my meaning.

            • Cleggory@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

              Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own *farts so go off.

                Whatever helps you sleep at night

                  • nomous@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Oh I know lots of defintions. It’s especially useful sniffing out self important jackasses who love to read their own words.